rarebirdz
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2011
- Messages
- 345
<beer> that is a great bull! Hope he will have semen available <party> (thumbsup)
I hope that the animals I raise are helping the industry. But I'm still in the business to sell animals , not keep every one of them. With as much as feed costs & the land to raise them on , I have to receive as much as I can. Did I say anything about the show circuit. No. I raise a lot of cattle that aren't going to make the show circuit type. Just look at the full Irish cattle I've advertised on here. I try to raise something to show myself, if I'm going to show. I take a lot of pride when an animal I raise does good in the ring. Last year for example I sold a heifer at KY Beef Expo for $2,000. Not bad money in my book, but in some herds that would be cull hfrs. That hfr went to GA & was Gr. Champ numerous times including at the GA Nat'l. If I'm going to show something I have to raise it because I don't have the $7500 to $50k to spend & then still get beat. If I pay bigger money for a hfr, it's because I think she can help my herd. If she is good enough to take to the state fair or somewhere else & play a little bit that's great.trevorgreycattleco said:Here we go again. Good for that fella. I got no bone to pick.
Doc, thats the difference between me and you. You want to breed something you can sell. I want to breed cattle that work to improve the industry. I dont really care about which pedigree is more popular with the show circuit. To each is their own. If my kids want to show cattle when they get old enough, they will show with something on the farm that we bred. I dont know why that is so not cool to do anymore. People take more pride in how much they paid for a animal or where they got it then their own animals. go figure. Obviously shortdawg is the wrong example to use. I think people get the drift tho. One thing for sure Doc. We agree to disagree. I would still buy you a drink anytime and have this chat some more. maybe you guys could change my little mind.
iowa said:posting picture for Turnpike
knabe said:Standing by a purpose true,
Heeding God’s command,
Honor them, the faithful few!
All hail to Daniel’s band!
Dare to be a Daniel,
Dare to stand alone!
Dare to have a purpose firm!
Dare to make it known.
Many mighty men are lost,
Daring not to stand,
Who for God had been a host
By joining Daniel’s band.
Many giants, great and tall,
Stalking through the land,
Headlong to the earth would fall,
If met by Daniel’s band.
Hold the Gospel banner high!
On to vict’ry grand!
Satan and his hosts defy,
And shout for Daniel’s band.
I guess, then, this is your sire for line-breeding "plus" cattle. IMO, anyways. One thing to notice, is, that similiar arguments happen among Gelbvieh, Limousin,and Simmental breeders. The guys getting deep into the Limiflex, Balancer, and SimAngus deal, are constantly being slammed by the Continental "purists". I should know, because Dad's banker is a Gelbvieh breeder with large, heavy milking, diluter-carrier, yellow cows. Dad's second cousin is a Gelbvieh breeder, turned Balancer fanatic. Whenever I see either one of them, each of them asks me, or my brothers about what we think about the other guy's breeding program.shortdawg said:Funny what I got accused of doing when I was selling some of my purebreds and moving my program in the Plus direction. Turnpike saw a couple of my Plus females a month or so back.
Doc, I definitely understand where you are coming from concerning your program. I think there is a lot of value in having the proof of the genetics when marketing cattle. I think that the consistency that comes with purebreds compared to crossbreds is probably what you are speaking to. I agree with this. When you have so many different crosses and genetics coming into play with a breeding, it may make more sense to go with the average purebred rather than a good or better crossbred. In your operation, and actually mine, that makes a lot of sense. In my opinion,with the right breeding, the purebred will end up creating the better cattle on a percentage basis than the crossbred.Doc said:I hope that the animals I raise are helping the industry. But I'm still in the business to sell animals , not keep every one of them. With as much as feed costs & the land to raise them on , I have to receive as much as I can. Did I say anything about the show circuit. No. I raise a lot of cattle that aren't going to make the show circuit type. Just look at the full Irish cattle I've advertised on here. I try to raise something to show myself, if I'm going to show. I take a lot of pride when an animal I raise does good in the ring. Last year for example I sold a heifer at KY Beef Expo for $2,000. Not bad money in my book, but in some herds that would be cull hfrs. That hfr went to GA & was Gr. Champ numerous times including at the GA Nat'l. If I'm going to show something I have to raise it because I don't have the $7500 to $50k to spend & then still get beat. If I pay bigger money for a hfr, it's because I think she can help my herd. If she is good enough to take to the state fair or somewhere else & play a little bit that's great.trevorgreycattleco said:Here we go again. Good for that fella. I got no bone to pick.
Doc, thats the difference between me and you. You want to breed something you can sell. I want to breed cattle that work to improve the industry. I dont really care about which pedigree is more popular with the show circuit. To each is their own. If my kids want to show cattle when they get old enough, they will show with something on the farm that we bred. I dont know why that is so not cool to do anymore. People take more pride in how much they paid for a animal or where they got it then their own animals. go figure. Obviously shortdawg is the wrong example to use. I think people get the drift tho. One thing for sure Doc. We agree to disagree. I would still buy you a drink anytime and have this chat some more. maybe you guys could change my little mind.
(thumbsup) You heard it here first! Well said!r.n.reed said:I feel the pedigree is a valuable tool.A pedigree usually is a reflection of the breeder.Is the breeder someone who has a longterm goal and disciplined program to achieve that goal or is he the catch up guy or maybe the opportunist who throws a couple extremes together to duplicate whats hot and unloads them?You can find that out by studying a pedigree in most cases.Most pedigrees don't lie!There are always exceptions but in most cases the animal will reflect the pedigree.For instance a Dual x Chiannia should typically not be a marbling machine and pass it on for generations.Another thing about a pedigree is one that means big money in one type of program can be a total disaster in another.
I started this thread because as we debate there are professional businessman who are industry leaders the kind you read about in Beef or Drovers that are trying some Shorthorn in their large scale commercial operations.If these guys find some strains that click with their programs the followers will be right behind them and someday we may be selling roan and white bulls because people will want proof that there is Shorthorn in their calves.No more sneaking them in the back door with red bulls or black crossbreds.