Exit fees for leaving big 12

Help Support Steer Planet:

aj

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
6,420
Location
western kansas
I heard that it was going to cost Nebraska 15 million dollars for Nebraska to leave the big 12. Is this tru? I also heard Colorado wanted back in the big 12 now.
 

OLD WORLD SHORTIE

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 15, 2008
Messages
813
Location
TX
Its a money issue, they dont want to pay the early exit fee.
I think that is where part of the Texas A&M 20million is supposed to be coming from. So if A&M doesnt get their money they will declare Texas independence and go to the SEC. along with Missiouri or Oklahoma
Word on the street is they will offer BYU an invitation to join the Big 12-2, but the street often lies, and sell discount items.
Another birdy told me KU an K-State might bolt if A&M leaves, but to the WAC or Mountain West

www.coloradodaily.com/latest-stories/ci_15879759#axzz0xYdk2FF4
 

JSchroeder

Well-known member
Joined
May 17, 2007
Messages
1,099
Location
San Antonio, Tx
I hate to post in what is an obvious troll by AJ but I've never had an issue with Nebraska, not even when they decided to bolt on the conference they lead the formation of.  But now the administration of that school is acting like a bunch of little weasels...

Nebraska Chancellor Harvey Perlman has said he doesn't believe departing schools owe the Big 12 any money.

Horse hockey.  It's spelled out in black and white in the by-laws your school signed.

3.3 Effect of Withdrawal From Conference Other Than by Giving Proper Notice. If,
other than by giving a proper Notice pursuant to Section 3.1, a Member Institution (a
“Breaching Member”) withdraws, resigns, or otherwise ceases to participate as a full
Member Institution in full compliance with these Rules, or gives notice or otherwise
states its intent to so withdraw, resign, or cease to participate in the future (a “Breach”),
then the Member Institutions agree that such Breach would cause financial hardship
to the remaining Member Institutions of the Conference, and that the financial
consequences cannot be measured or estimated with certainty at this time. Therefore,
in recognition of the obligations and responsibilities of each Member Institution to
all other Member Institutions of the Conference, each Member Institution agrees that
after such Breach, the amount of Conference revenue that would otherwise have been
distributed or distributable to the Breaching Member during the two (2) years prior to
the end of the Current Term or the then-current Additional Term, as the case may be,
shall be reduced by an amount that equals the sum of the aggregate of such revenues
times the following percentages (such sum being the “Aggregate Reduction”); if Notice
is received less than two years but on or before eighteen months prior to the Effective
Date, 70%; if Notice is received less than eighteen months but on or before twelve
months prior to the Effective Date, 80%; if Notice is received less than twelve months
but on or before six months prior to the Effective Date, 90%; or if Notice is received
less than six months prior to the Effective Date, 100%.

After such Breach, none of the revenues that otherwise would be distributable to a
Breaching Member shall be paid to the Breaching Member until the aggregate amount
so withheld (the “Withheld Amounts”) equals the Aggregate Reduction; thereafter, all
revenues that would otherwise have been distributable to the Breaching Member shall
be so distributed. If the Withheld Amounts are less than the Aggregate Reduction, then
the Member Institutions acknowledge and agree that the Conference shall assess such
Breaching Member an amount that equals the difference of the Aggregate Reduction
less the Withheld Amounts, and the Breaching Member agrees that on or prior to the
Effective Date it shall repay to the Conference such amount from revenue that previously
had been distributed to such Breaching Member.
The Withheld Amounts and any such
repayment of the difference of the Aggregate Reduction less the Withheld Amounts
shall be distributed to the other Member Institutions who are not Withdrawing Members
or Breaching Members as additional Conference revenues in accordance with Section
2 herein. The Member Institutions agree that such reduction in the distribution of
revenues to a Breaching Member is reasonable and shall be in the form of liquidated
damages and not be construed as a penalty.

Long story short, Nebraska owes the Big XII 160% of one years' revenue (2 * 80%)

Do what you want, I have no issue with watching out for yourself.  However, if you make an agreement, stand behind what you say.
 

sam1988

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 23, 2010
Messages
56
Agreements are agreements....pay up!  My understnding is that the big 10 has greater revenues to share, so they still come out ahead in the long run. 
 

iowabeef

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 24, 2009
Messages
1,047
Location
Iowa
The Big 10 took a huge risk when they started the Big 10 network and it has paid off for them hugely.  That is what really prompted this realignment talk all over the country.  Everyone else is trying to establish this same kind of TV deal......
 

JSchroeder

Well-known member
Joined
May 17, 2007
Messages
1,099
Location
San Antonio, Tx
Nobody is complaining about them leaving, they have every right to do so and the method for doing so was spelled out in the rules of the Big XII.  The complaint is they are trying to renege on the fee for doing so in the manner they did.

Put frankly, Tom Osborne and the university administration are acting like little punks.
 

aj

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
6,420
Location
western kansas
Maybe they are trying tos save some pesos for their "Peso" defense(and their hybrid safety/linebacker).
 

Latest posts

Top