Is the future bright for agriculture in general?

Help Support Steer Planet:

cowz

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
1,492
Here is an interesting article on ag trends I thought you might enjoy.  No cheesy jokes, no Christmas cheer, please no more karma hits!!  Haha!  Love and kisses!!  Cowz

If current population trends continue, our world will face the challenge in the next 10 to 15 years of feeding another China, or about another 1 billion people. Most of that growth will not be in the United States, but provides an ideal market for U.S. farmers.

Speaking at the recent Southern Crop Production Association’s annual meeting in Savannah, Ga., John Chrosniak says dramatic population changes constitute mega-trends in economics that provide permanent trends offering exciting challenges for U.S. growers.

Chrosniak, senior economic planner for DuPont, says, “The current middle class in China exceeds 300 million people — more than the total population of the United States. These people want to drive cars and eat more meat. Right now Brazilian soybeans are feeding Chinese livestock that provides meat for China’s middle class.”

China, Chrosniak says, will be a bigger and bigger customer for U.S. farm goods. The Chinese economy since 2005 has grown at better than 10 percent per year, compared to 3.5 to 4.5 percent for the rest of the world.

As economies grow in China, India and other rapidly emerging economic nations, and as people acquire some wealth, the first thing they want to buy is an improved diet — not Ipods and modern gadgets, according to Chrosniak.

“These worldwide population trends, that we call mega-trends, will drive agriculture for the next 100 years. We believe these mega-trends are producing permanent trends that bode well for agriculture. As middle classes grow in China and India and other countries around the world, the demand for high quality food and fiber products will grow,” the DuPont economist says.

In addition to demand for better food and fiber products, the rapidly growing middle class of countries from Mexico to China will demand better transportation and that means more competition for finite sources of petroleum products. Worldwide there will be an increasingly loud call for alternative fuel, which again offers some long-range opportunities for farmers to produce viable sources of sustainable energy.

A third demand by people who acquire resources worldwide will be the demand for safety and security. High on that list is better quality food that offers a healthy, high standard of living for people in developing countries.

“I believe these perma-trends means agriculture will see greater and greater demands, from developing more efficient crop protection materials to better utilization of the land at the farm level,” Chrosniak says.

“Unfortunately, there is no silver bullet for agriculture. The answer lies in a combination of strategies. How we get to the point of producing 500 bushels of corn per acre and 150-200 bushels of soybeans per acre as a worldwide average, for example, is a challenge that faces companies like DuPont, and all the other players on a worldwide stage, right down to the farm level,” Chrosniak says.

Worldwide, farm acreage has increased by only 2 percent over the past decade, while in the United States acreage is down. At the same time, the world population has increased by 12 percent, consumption of pork has increased 27 percent, chicken 28 percent, soybeans 40 percent, and corn 22 percent.

The demand for agricultural products is increasing not just for food products. Use of fiber, both cotton and forestry products, has increased steadily over the past decade. Neither U.S. cotton nor wood production or demand has increased nearly as rapidly as worldwide demand. The demand for these U.S. products will increasingly come from foreign markets.

Cotton is a good example. The U.S. textile industry is rapidly declining, leaving demand for U.S. grown cotton now under 20 percent. It is projected that by 2015 China will import nearly half (47 percent) of the world’s cotton production. Based on this trend, Chrosniak contends the future for American cotton producers is bright.

On the other side of that coin, American cotton producers have to understand they are growing a crop for sale outside the United States. The cotton quality that is demanded by foreign buyers is different than the quality needed by domestic textile mills. Similar parallels exist in other crops, forcing U.S. growers to take a closer look at what foreign markets want and how they can best compete with farmers on a world market, Chrosniak says.

He points out that worldwide soybean demand will grow by 27 million tons. Of that 27 million tons of increase, China will use 78 percent. Countries like Argentina, once minor players in world soybean production, are expected to crush more than 3 million tons per year.

A limiting factor in increasing farm productivity may be water. A recent United Nations report says, the world’s sources of freshwater, such as rivers, lakes and groundwater reservoirs, will not be able to sustain future generations if they continue to be overexploited.

The report, “Let It Reign: The New Water Paradigm for Global Food Security,” warns that without major reform in water management, by 2050 the world may require twice as much water to sustain its projected global population of 9 billion.

In the Southeast, farmers are facing the consequences of an ongoing drought, that has already threatened the livestock industry in Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina, North Carolina and Virginia because of a dire shortage of winter forage and hay.

Water wars between Alabama, Georgia, and Florida over use of water from the Chattahoochee River have received national attention. And, a water war over use of water from Catawba River in North Carolina and South Carolina has already gone to the U.S. Supreme Court.

A second limiting factor for U.S. farmers will be energy. In the United States, production of biofuels is expected to top 30 billion gallons — a 14 percent increase. The European Union, by comparison, is expected to grow at better than 25 percent.

How to convert energy from the sun to plants to sustainable energy is a race against time, as fossil fuel costs are threatening to top $100 per barrel.

Ethanol and methanol produced from plants and livestock waste simply cannot provide the needed volume at a favorable price without severely impacting food prices needed to replace a high percentage of fossil fuel use worldwide.

One overlooked, but potentially sustainable source of energy is biobutanol. A single gallon of biobutanol produces 110,000 Btu — comparable to the power output of gasoline. It can be used in gasoline-powered cars with no overhaul and doesn’t have the transportation problems of ethanol and methanol.

The key will be to find the right conversion material. Currently, biobutanol and ethanol are competing for the same source — primarily corn. Regardless of the source, the best bet is that it will be grown as a non-edible crop and grown on farmland not ideally suited to crop production.

From fuel to food, to fiber, on a worldwide basis, Chrosniak contends, the future for agriculture is bright.

 

red

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 20, 2007
Messages
7,850
Location
LaRue, Ohio
I'm more interested in Knabe's take on this. Woody is sitting on my lap at the computer & it's very hard to type w/ a puppy nipping & licking your hands at the same time!!

Red
 

knabe

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
13,639
Location
Hollister, CA
your fingers are not chew toy!  i hope you allow that guy to go after some mice or gophers. they are awesome.
 

knabe

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
13,639
Location
Hollister, CA
the best bet is that it will be grown as a non-edible crop and grown on farmland not ideally suited to crop production.

america and the world is being weaned on food that no longer looks like food, jamba juice, odwalla juice, puree's etc.  food in it's raw form will be for the elites in society.  wars will be fought over water.  our population is losing all it's previous limits on it's increase.  the metaphor for me is the horse slaughter.  what will we do with the horses from age 15 till death?  almost every decision i can think of parallels this as almost no one is involved in dealing with actual production of anything anymore and are essentially professional consumers.  not allowing people or dogs to eat horses is ridiculous, if only we could put that same emotion on bacteria (like the jainism) the world would figure out more quickly that this logic is unrealistic, but no, we have to take away choice with horse slaughter as more of a moral dilemna than choice for humans.  i know, red flag, but things are out of whack when we value horse life more than miseryless human life.

the equivalent of soylent green type scenarios will become tomorrow's global warming hysteria.  body types will be taxed through higher and higher costs for waste recompsition.  since no one has the audacity to limit production of people, like the thoroughbred industry has, ie only live coverage, it's gonna get worse.  procreation is the new religion as a byproduct of the destruction of the family unit.  this fits well with the centralization of power in the government, as it will be illegal at some point to have a kid without government permission.  only those countries, or whatever the equivalent are called that choose to self choose limits, ie conserve, will be able to sustain an economy as the extreme will be those who don't conserve either resources or behavior.  i agree, the future of agriculture is bright.  individual property rights is important. 

i hope i didn't violate my promises to cowz or sru with this one.
 

chambero

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
3,207
Location
Texas
I'm in the water "business".  It's rapidly becoming cheaper to conserve than to waste.

We'll see a shift in this country where we grow things as the value (or expense) of water goes up and cities will pay landowners for it. 

Land and everything associated with it and produced from it will do nothing but go up in value.
 

cowz

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
1,492
Knabe.....Soylent Green??  Haven't heard that one in quite a while!  You are dating yourself my friend!!   
 

knabe

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
13,639
Location
Hollister, CA
SRU said:
knabe said:
i hope i didn't violate my promises to cowz or sru with this one.

what promise to me?  one per day?

i'll let it slide?

yes.  ok this counts as my one for the day.

http://reason.com/news/show/123745.html

The Death of Main Street

Are big chains to blame, or is excessive regulation?

People who decry the Wal-Mart-ification and Gap-ificaiton of America need to realize that regulation often does more harm to local businesses than predatory pricing, loss-leader business models, or some other imagined corporate evil.

Big businesses know that a heavy regulatory burden is the best way to make sure small- and medium-sized businesses never rise up to challenge them.

i vote excessive regulation, simple binary answer, no depends, no diapers, no nothing.  we dogooders do no good.  this is the law of unintended consequences.  translation?  do gooders doing no good.
 
Top