Los Zetas seizes control of two U.S. ranches in Texas N/C

Help Support Steer Planet:

Doc

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 13, 2007
Messages
3,636
Location
Cottontown, Tennessee
This is unreal!!

Los Zetas seizes control of two U.S. ranches in Texas



Laredo :  TX :  USA | Jul 24, 2010 at 11:28 AM PDT

By kimberlydvorak send a private message








5546

Views: 38,767





1 of 1



Smuggles walk north into America with drugs

file





In what could be deemed an act of war against the sovereign borders of the United States, Mexican drug cartels have seized control of at least two American ranches inside the U.S. territory near Laredo, Texas.


Two sources inside the Laredo Police Department confirmed the incident is unfolding and they would continue to coordinate with U.S. Border Patrol today. “We consider this an act of war,” said one police officer on the ground near the scene. There is a news blackout of this incident at this time and the sources inside Laredo PD spoke on the condition of anonymity.


Word broke late last night that Laredo police have requested help from the federal government regarding the incursion by the Los Zetas. It appears that the ranch owners have escaped without incident but their ranches remain in the hands of the blood thirsty cartels.


Laredo Border Patrol is conducting aerial surveillance over the ranches to determine the best way to regain control of the U.S. ranches, according to the Laredo Police department.


The approximate location of the U.S. ranches are10 miles northwest of I-35 off Mines Road and Minerales Annex Road. Just off 1472 (Mines road) near Santa Isabel Creek south of the city of Laredo, Texas.


The Los Zetas drug cartel is an offshoot of the elite Mexican military trained in special ops. The mercenary organization is said to include members of corrupt Mexican Federales, politicians as well as drug traffickers. The group was once part of the Gulf cartel, but has since splintered and now directly competes with the Gulf cartel for premium drug smuggling routes in the Texas region.


The new leader of Los Zetas is Heriberto “El Lazca” Lazcano and is considered the most violent paramilitary group in Mexico by the DEA.


Recently the drug organization has kidnapped tourists, infiltrated local municipalities and continues to smuggle narcotics into a very hungry U.S. market.


The violence south of the border continues to spin out of control and has left Nuevo Laredo, Mexico on virtual lockdown with businesses refusing to open the doors. Last week a particularly violent attack by the Los Zetas included the use of grenades and resulted in a dozen deaths and 21 injuries.


The hostile takeover of the ranches has met with silence with local and national media; however sources say they could be waiting to report the stories once the ranches are back in U.S. control. This journalist questions if this was a Middle Eastern terrorist attack if the media would sit on their hands.


Stay tuned for updates reports throughout the weekend.
 

KSanburg

Well-known member
Joined
May 5, 2010
Messages
695
Location
Western Colorado
No, now they are trying to protect them through the immigration reform act. And according to XBar we don't need semi automatic weapons! Not that you would want to battle them on your own but if it came down to a fire fight I would sure want a AR-15 or 10 and as many 30 round clip or better yet 100 round drums in my corner as I can get my hands on.

The ranchers were lucky and made a good move getting out when they could, but that may not always be a choice.
 

knabe

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
13,639
Location
Hollister, CA
maybe we could use the armored carriers the HSA bought.

do we really have a country anymore if the federal government won't protect us?

each day, our government incrementally does as little as possible to incite violence with continual elimination of freedom.

one day people will look up and ask themselves what happened.

at that point, it will be too late.
 

Gargan

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 24, 2011
Messages
3,060
Location
West Virginia
knabe said:
maybe we could use the armored carriers the HSA bought.

do we really have a country anymore if the federal government won't protect us?

each day, our government incrementally does as little as possible to incite violence with continual elimination of freedom.

one day people will look up and ask themselves what happened.

at that point, it will be too late.
I've already asked that question to myself in the last 4-6 yrs
 

mark tenenbaum

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Messages
5,765
Location
Virginia Sometimes Iowa and Kansas
Well-if it happened in 2010 are they still there? I heard through a grapevine that "private security people" from our side have inadvertantly mistaken cartel members for dear or coyotes while on hunting trips and a number of them have been accidentally killed. O0
 

Doc

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 13, 2007
Messages
3,636
Location
Cottontown, Tennessee
-XBAR- said:
Prohibition created the cartels.
How the heck did prohibition create the cartels? If I'm not mistaken the cartels are involved in illegal drugs like meth, coke, weed, etc.

A tank would be more effective, Mtnman. I want a tank.
One of the smartest things you have ever said or at least 1 of the things that I agree with, even tho I know you were being sarcastic.
 

RyanChandler

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 6, 2011
Messages
3,457
Location
Pottsboro, TX
You gotta work on your definitions, Doc.

pro·hi·bi·tion  (pr-bshn)
n.
1. The act of prohibiting or the condition of being prohibited.
2. A law, order, or decree that forbids something.

Happy 4th!
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 319

Doc

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 13, 2007
Messages
3,636
Location
Cottontown, Tennessee
-XBAR- said:
You gotta work on your definitions, Doc.

pro·hi·bi·tion  (pr-bshn)
n.
1. The act of prohibiting or the condition of being prohibited.
2. A law, order, or decree that forbids something.

Happy 4th!

My definitions are fine, as you will see below. I presumed that you were talking about Prohibition that took place during the 20's and 30's that most people think of when they hear that word. As far as the cartels go, they are a bunch of thugs and criminals that promote and sell illegal drugs along with kidnappings and murder for hire. Another reason for keeping the illegal Mexican's from gaining citizen status without going thru the proper channels.

pro·hi·bi·tion
  [proh-uh-bish-uhn]  Show IPA 

noun 
1.
the act of prohibiting.

2.
the legal prohibiting of the manufacture and sale of alcoholic drinks for common consumption.

3.
( often initial capital letter ) the period (1920–33) when the Eighteenth Amendment was in force and alcoholic beverages could not legally be manufactured, transported, or sold in the U.S.

4.
a law or decree that forbids.
 

RyanChandler

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 6, 2011
Messages
3,457
Location
Pottsboro, TX
knabe said:
-XBAR- said:
Consequences?  We talkin bout cattle judges again?

no, just owning up to the consequences of any prohibition or mandate.

Cartels are the consequence of prohibition (lower case p).  If the prices of drugs weren't artificially inflated (through prohibition), there would be no INCENTIVE for these cartels to form.
 

KSanburg

Well-known member
Joined
May 5, 2010
Messages
695
Location
Western Colorado
-XBAR- said:
Prohibition created the cartels.

A tank would be more effective, Mtnman. I want a tank.


Yeah well lets see you go purchase a tank and ammunition in working order today or any other day XBar. Yes that would be great but you and I both know that ain't going to happen. So take what you can buy today and hope for the best.  This is kind of ridiculous, hell if we could just choose our weaponry with out any restriction then why not have a black hawk helicopter?  Or maybe an A-10 warthog, really that would be my choice. Then you can mow them off with that 20MM canon and saw their trucks and cars in half.
 

Latest posts

Top