New federal hunting age of 21 !!!

Help Support Steer Planet:

Doc

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 13, 2007
Messages
3,636
Location
Cottontown, Tennessee
Is there any truth to this??

National Report>The United States Government has decided 2015 is the year to enact a new nationwide “minimum hunting age” of 21. Previously, each state has set its own minimum age for a hunter to hunt alone and sometimes a different age for minors to hunt while in the company of an adult.

The federal regulation, set to go into effect on July 1st, 2015, will supersede all existing hunting age restrictions in all fifty U.S. states. For example, prior to this ruling Alaska had no license require for any hunters under the age of 15; meaning that a four-year old could go out and hunt game with or without adult supervision. Under the new policy, any hunters under the age of 21 will be locked out of the sport and all hunters over 21 will be required to show a national hunting license upon request from a game warden.

In addition to the nationwide minimum hunting age now being 21, all hunters will have to take a federally sponsored annual “hunting safety and wildlife appreciation” course which will feature a written exam that must be passed to be eligible to receive a National Hunting License. All prospective hunters must also pass an annual physical endurance test and receive clearance from their primary care physician. Under these new regulations, individual state licenses will no longer be required and state game wardens will become federalized.





Younger hunters will be able to first take the safety and appreciation course starting at the age of 19. They will then be allowed to participate in no more than three ‘mock hunts’ per year which will be organized by the federally approved groups offering the courses. The ‘mock hunt’ will not feature live ammunition or live game but will attempt to simulate an actual hunt as closely as possible. 20-year-old prospective hunters will be able to apply for a license up to sixty days before their birthday, however, the license will not be valid until their actual date of birth.

“We wanted to be sure that everyone was able to successfully plan a hunting expedition with their loved ones for a twenty-first birthday party,” explained U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service spokesman Gregory Pearson. “We realize that these changes will be upsetting to some so we tried to make this transition as painless as possible.”

The new federal regulations have, predictably, been met with outrage from the hunting and gun enthusiast communities.

The National Rifle Association has begun a petition asking for the immediate repeal of these new restrictions. When contacted, they presented a prepared statement that said they intend to “challenge these restrictions” and demand that “states are once again given the right to dictate who is allowed to hunt and when”. The NRA also is in strict opposition to the penalties levied upon violators of the new regulations that include the seizure of firearms.  A first offense of “hunting with a minor under the age of 21″ will result in immediate suspension of their National Hunting License for one year. A second offense will result in the confiscation of all hunting implements, including firearms, bows and their ammunition, and potentially a fine and jail time. A third offense will result in mandatory jail time as well as the fines and confiscations second time offenders are subject to. Likewise, anyone under 21 caught with hunting tools or weapons will have the instruments confiscated and will be subject to time in a juvenile detention center. Repeat offenders will be denied the ability to apply for a federal license.

There has been quite an uproar on the internet by Americans unhappy with the changes. Herb Boucher, of Glenview Hills, Kentucky posted the following on a Facebook discussion about the new restrictions, “I took my boy out on his first hunt when he was just five. He’s fifteen now and I will not stop hunting with him no matter what that Obama idiot has to say. That is my time with my boy and they can’t stop me, I’d like to see them try.”

“The thing to remember is that hunting is a privilege, not a right,” concluded spokesman Pearson. “We hope that these new restrictions will teach all Americans the value of wildlife and how to safely conduct themselves on a hunt. Far too often, the television shows children grow up watching glamorize the wrong aspects of hunting wild game and we intend to teach them the proper mindset to be in while out in the forest.”
- See more at: http://nationalreport.net/federal-government-restrict-hunting-setting-minimum-age-21/#sthash.jgxVLirO.dpuf
 

knabe

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
13,639
Location
Hollister, CA
What about sex?

Same rules should apply

If you have a kid before 21, the penalty is sterility.

 

rtmcc

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 11, 2008
Messages
727
Location
Peterson, MN
All the effort made to get young people involved in the outdoors and now this?? I can't believe it's true.  But if it is they have sure kept it quiet.
Ridiculous!!
 

knabe

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
13,639
Location
Hollister, CA
Younger sexers will be able to first take the safety and appreciation course starting at the age of 19. They will then be allowed to participate in no more than three ‘mock sexes’ per year which will be organized by the federally approved groups offering the courses. The ‘mock sex’ will not feature live sperm or eggs or live sexers but will attempt to simulate an actual sex as closely as possible. 20-year-old prospective sexers will be able to apply for a license up to sixty days before their birthday, however, the license will not be valid until their actual date of birth. -


After that, they can apply for a permit to have children, and of course wombless alternatives will be offered. Permits must be applied for on an annual basis and sex can only occur for three attempts.  Upon failure to conceive, federal intervention will occur to determine the party at fault upon which the failed party will apply for a termination license and fee payable to the federal government to cover costs of extermination. Once conception occurs, a permit must be obtained to carry the parasite to term under certain conditions. If conditions are not suitable, termination will occur at the discretion of the federal government. Any failure to comply will result in termination.
 

Doc

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 13, 2007
Messages
3,636
Location
Cottontown, Tennessee
-XBAR- said:
I'm more curious in whether not doc really thought this was true/

Ryan, I know that I'm not as smart as you but no I didn't think this was true. This was a body of an email that had been sent to me , but had been sent to several people already. So you wonder how many people do think it is true. What is scary is that in todays world is that I could envision this happening at some point.
 

RyanChandler

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 6, 2011
Messages
3,457
Location
Pottsboro, TX
Doc said:
-XBAR- said:
I'm more curious in whether not doc really thought this was true/

So you wonder how many people do think it is true.

What is scary is that in todays world is that I could envision this happening at some point.

Then by your own omission,  the author was successful in his attempt to incite unfounded fear in your mind.  There's no shame in being duped.  Shame should come from not acknowledging who is responsible for this type of continuous fear mongering propaganda.
 

vc

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
1,811
Location
So-Cal
Ryan, the way things go anymore, you could get bit in the behind if you wrote something like this off as a spoof. In California we hear stuff like this all the time, you grin and think it is a joke, only to find out it came right out of Sacramento. Most the time it is a proposal that does not go far, other times they actually bring these things up to a vote.

Either side of the isle can come up with these brilliant ideas, it is all about getting votes, if they think it will bring in enough support they will run it up the flagpole in hopes they can pick up those extra fringe voters. It is not about logic it is all about votes and winning, the politicians who use logic get run out of town in a hurry anymore.
 

knabe

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
13,639
Location
Hollister, CA
What is unfounded about democrats wanting to ban guns?

They are complete happy using hoses instead of guns though.

There is no more death loving group of people than progressives.

Centuries ago when voting first started, it was quickly learned that emotion and fear wins votes.

This doesn't detract from the reality that progressives would outlaw guns in a heartbeat if they could, hence the more effective incremental approach and constant drumbeat that every tragedy is local.

Meanwhile, no compromise on abortion. It's too effective at reducing unwanted class demographics for progressives to ever realize they are the biggest murderers in history while at the same time banning spanking.
 

librarian

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
1,629
Location
Knox County Nebraska
They are just baiting people.
What I wonder about is the government getting into the radio frequency reader tag business. I helped a guy yesterday who was putting them in and the was an entire cluster of state veterinarians there collecting data on his herd.
What if they say everyone who raises animals for food has to get documented like this is and it is illegal to raise undocumented food?
 

chambero

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
3,207
Location
Texas
There is enough wrong in this world without making crap up.  I couldn't tell you how many Facebook posts I saw about "confirmed" ebola breakouts originating from "conservative" news outlets.  All of this kind of crap is blatant lies.  Don't justify lying by saying "it could be true".
 

Latest posts

Top