OCC Legend or OCC Anchor for clubby mamas

Help Support Steer Planet:

BAS

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2011
Messages
19
Location
Texas
Can anyone tell me which of these bulls OCC Legend or OCC Anchor are best for clubby mamas when put on a good Maine Donor that has a little to much leg. She is a 6.25 to 6.5 frame
 

CAB

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
5,607
Location
Corning,Iowa
My choice would be Anchor and I like Legend as far as that goes, but you'll find more great cows with Anchor in them so far than Legends. It may just be that Anchor is ahead of Legend time line wise. I have had some larger framed Legend calves also. You may want to look into the Anchor clone if you don't have the original Anchor semen. I know that SEK has the clone on hand. JMO
 

BAS

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2011
Messages
19
Location
Texas
CAB said:
My choice would be Anchor and I like Legend as far as that goes, but you'll find more great cows with Anchor in them so far than Legends. It may just be that Anchor is ahead of Legend time line wise. I have had some larger framed Legend calves also. You may want to look into the Anchor clone if you don't have the original Anchor semen. I know that SEK has the clone on hand. JMO
Thanks I have the semen of both. Just did not know if Anchor was as structurely correct as Legend and I never have seen daughters of either. Do you know if they milk well
 

chambero

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
3,207
Location
Texas
Both bulls generally throw daughters that milk.  Anchor cattle are too small for some peoples taste,  legends will have a little more growth.
 

Telos

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
2,267
Location
Dallas, Texas
Had an Anchor daughter out of a DMCC donor cow. She looked great but always had problems. She had two blind quarters on her udder and did not milk worth a flip. Threw an SP calf then pinched a nerve on her third calf and I had to put her down.

I do like the structure on Legend's offspring better then Anchor. Especially on Maine genetics. Anchor's can get too straight on some. 
 

bryan6807

Well-known member
Joined
May 15, 2011
Messages
318
Location
Zeeland, MI
I have found anchor to be a cow changer, were as Legend compliments the cow more. I have seen a few legends in production with clubby calves on them and they seem to work, they are fertile were I have had a few anchor daughters and fertility seemed to always be the issue with anchor daughters. I would use Legend, anchor makes them pretty but I dont care how pretty they are, if they dont have a calf they aren't worth much.
 

clementcattle

Well-known member
Joined
May 4, 2011
Messages
83
Location
California
Ohlde cattle are way too small for most "real life" producers but for show calves they will make them really moderate and soggy.  They seem to come along with typical Ohlde udeer and structure problems.
 

OH Breeder

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 14, 2007
Messages
5,954
Location
Ada, Ohio
clementcattle said:
Ohlde cattle are way too small for most "real life" producers but for show calves they will make them really moderate and soggy.  They seem to come along with typical Ohlde udeer and structure problems.


Hun?
 

Mill Iron A

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 12, 2011
Messages
516
I would rather go BC Classic myself, sorry I know that wasn't an option but he is out of a full sister to Legend...
 

nate53

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2011
Messages
419
Location
North East, Missouri
Mill Iron A said:
I would rather go BC Classic myself, sorry I know that wasn't an option but he is out of a full sister to Legend...
Whatever happended to G 13 Structure and some of his progeny ( Lagrand Forum, Style-maybe full sib?).  QLC out of Hastings Nebraska had them and they always seemed to do really good in Denver.  They would be bigger cattle  though. 

Ohlde talks about about how Anchor improves structure so much on their site, and Legend is flawless phenotypically with their best cow families in his pedigree.  They both seem to be very similar as far as the #'s (which are below breed average in just about every way).  Awesome on $EN though.
 

Freddy

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
2,720
Location
North central -- Nebraska on highway 183 - 30 mi
OHLDE-cattle are mainly from Traveler 6807  and those cattle have always had a fertility problem and I'm not sure about udders ...We have been using a son of NEW eDITION that has more grow but has some trmendous clubby type females ......
 

clementcattle

Well-known member
Joined
May 4, 2011
Messages
83
Location
California
OH Breeder said:
clementcattle said:
Ohlde cattle are way too small for most "real life" producers but for show calves they will make them really moderate and soggy.  They seem to come along with typical Ohlde udeer and structure problems.


Hun?

Excuse me, i meant to say reproductive, not udder problems.  My bad folks.
 

ploughshare

Well-known member
Joined
May 30, 2008
Messages
589
For me either bull makes a cow that is too small with poor maternal calving ease.  The cows look great, are sound and have well hung, tight udders with small teats and enough milk.  My biggest complaint is the maternal calving ease. Pushing out a stout clubby calf  may cause problems.
 

clementcattle

Well-known member
Joined
May 4, 2011
Messages
83
Location
California
I really appreciate the visual quality and $EN in the ohlde lines, I think it's interesting how much weaning and post weaning growth is emphasized in genetics these days but that "gain" doesn't come from thin air. The more growth you add to them the higher nutritional demands go up.  It's kind of scary how extreme some of these "growth" bulls are becoming.
 

GoWyo

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 29, 2008
Messages
1,691
Location
Wyoming
I have to agree with Glenstory on this as the CEM on both bulls is way too low.  I bred to BC Lookout for 2 years and will probably stop using him due to CEM of +1 (only used 5 shots and everything has been bulls so far out of cows with good CEM).  If going to run Angus based clubbies, it seems to me that the CEM on the parent stock needs to be at least 5 or 6 and 10 would be better.  Looking at BC Classic 385-7 here too in lieu of Lookout due to the much higher CEM.

We used Northern Improvement on a deep ribbed Maine heifer and the heifer calf is shaping up really nice.  Surprisingly short-statured and definitely stout with some bone to her.  I suspect she is going to put on some frame soon though.

Has anybody used JSAR Rodman?  If so, how did that turn out?
 

BAS

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2011
Messages
19
Location
Texas
GoWyo said:
I have to agree with Glenstory on this as the CEM on both bulls is way too low.  I bred to BC Lookout for 2 years and will probably stop using him due to CEM of +1 (only used 5 shots and everything has been bulls so far out of cows with good CEM).  If going to run Angus based clubbies, it seems to me that the CEM on the parent stock needs to be at least 5 or 6 and 10 would be better.  Looking at BC Classic 385-7 here too in lieu of Lookout due to the much higher CEM.

We used Northern Improvement on a deep ribbed Maine heifer and the heifer calf is shaping up really nice.  Surprisingly short-statured and definitely stout with some bone to her.  I suspect she is going to put on some frame soon though.

Has anybody used JSAR Rodman?  If so, how did that turn out?
WOW just saw  JSAR Rodman for first time what a great looking bull and he does have great numbers do you know of any others just like him that are a bit more moderate
 

ploughshare

Well-known member
Joined
May 30, 2008
Messages
589
BAS said:
GoWyo said:
I have to agree with Glenstory on this as the CEM on both bulls is way too low.  I bred to BC Lookout for 2 years and will probably stop using him due to CEM of +1 (only used 5 shots and everything has been bulls so far out of cows with good CEM).  If going to run Angus based clubbies, it seems to me that the CEM on the parent stock needs to be at least 5 or 6 and 10 would be better.  Looking at BC Classic 385-7 here too in lieu of Lookout due to the much higher CEM.

We used Northern Improvement on a deep ribbed Maine heifer and the heifer calf is shaping up really nice.  Surprisingly short-statured and definitely stout with some bone to her.  I suspect she is going to put on some frame soon though.

Has anybody used JSAR Rodman?  If so, how did that turn out?
WOW just saw  JSAR Rodman for first time what a great looking bull and he does have great numbers do you know of any others just like him that are a bit more moderate

JSAR Titan 201 will get you there.

 

GoWyo

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 29, 2008
Messages
1,691
Location
Wyoming
Glenstory - the photo of JSAR Titan makes him look short necked.  I take it he has more extension in real life?
 

ploughshare

Well-known member
Joined
May 30, 2008
Messages
589
GoWyo said:
Glenstory - the photo of JSAR Titan makes him look short necked.  I take it he has more extension in real life?
Here is a picture of Titan when he sold as Lot 30 in the 2010 JSAR Top Cut sale.  When I talked with Greg Stewart about his Angus he thought more of Titan at the same age.  He also mentioned that both bulls were moderate in frame.  JSAR has a herd of high $W cows.
 

Attachments

  • JSAR Titan 102.jpg
    JSAR Titan 102.jpg
    40.7 KB · Views: 292

Latest posts

Top