superbowl

Help Support Steer Planet:

bcosu

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 22, 2008
Messages
853
Location
Ohio
that was a pretty good game. nice that both teams had to come from behind and have big plays. i am a little sad that the cardinals didn't pull it out but santonio holmes sure represented THE Ohio State University.
 

herfchic

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 15, 2008
Messages
148
Location
IL
Sad that the Cardinals couldn't pull it out.  I can't believe that they didn't review the last Warner fumble. 
 

Davis Shorthorns

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
1,872
Location
Kansas
herfchic said:
Sad that the Cardinals couldn't pull it out.  I can't believe that they didn't review the last Warner fumble. 

Yea, that play was horrid!!!  If they had reviewed it, it would have been a incomplete pass and with the 15 yd penalty tacked on to it that would have put them at about the 20 yrd line with one play left.  Not saying that they would have got in, but at least it would have been a chance.  Overall good game. 
 

jason

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2006
Messages
3,046
Location
Emporia, Kansas
Davis Shorthorns said:
herfchic said:
Sad that the Cardinals couldn't pull it out.  I can't believe that they didn't review the last Warner fumble. 

Yea, that play was horrid!!!  If they had reviewed it, it would have been a incomplete pass and with the 15 yd penalty tacked on to it that would have put them at about the 20 yrd line with one play left.  Not saying that they would have got in, but at least it would have been a chance.  Overall good game. 

They also didn't call holmes in the endzone using the football as a prop, which is a 15 yard penalty.  So 30 yards that were not given to the cardinals on the last drive.  They would most likely had 2 shots at the endzone, and with Fitzgerald those are not bad chances.
 

DLD

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 15, 2007
Messages
1,539
Location
sw Oklahoma
herfchic said:
Sad that the Cardinals couldn't pull it out.  I can't believe that they didn't review the last Warner fumble. 
 

I believe the announcers said that a call couldn't be reviewed after the 2 minute warning.  I don't watch much pro football, but this one almost seemed over-officiated, imo.  Great game anyway.
 

shortyjock89

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
4,465
Location
IL
DLD said:
herfchic said:
Sad that the Cardinals couldn't pull it out.  I can't believe that they didn't review the last Warner fumble. 
 

I believe the announcers said that a call couldn't be reviewed after the 2 minute warning.  I don't watch much pro football, but this one almost seemed over-officiated, imo.  Great game anyway.

A coach can't CHALLENGE a call. But booth reviews are commonplace when the play was questionable, especially in big games. The play should have been reviewed, IMO.
 

DLD

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 15, 2007
Messages
1,539
Location
sw Oklahoma
Olson Family Shorthorns said:
DLD said:
herfchic said:
Sad that the Cardinals couldn't pull it out.  I can't believe that they didn't review the last Warner fumble. 
 

I believe the announcers said that a call couldn't be reviewed after the 2 minute warning.  I don't watch much pro football, but this one almost seemed over-officiated, imo.  Great game anyway.

A coach can't CHALLENGE a call. But booth reviews are commonplace when the play was questionable, especially in big games. The play should have been reviewed, IMO.
 

Ah, okay.  Yes, I agree, it should've been reviewed then.
 

Latest posts

Top