Lautner Farms' Semen Catalog

Anyone else notice that the picture they are using for Who 2 is Ree Heights.  Is it a bad mistake or are they just putting in a picture so people are happy?

i wondered the same thing!! is that not false advertising? lol

i think they just put him there because he is a who son

It could be a mistake on the behalf of whoever put the catalog together.  Or if they didnt have a picture its not uncommon for them to put a pic of offspring.  However, since he is a Clone I dont see why they wouldnt just put a pic of Who himself there.  So I am gonna take a shot and the dark and say it may be a mistake.

last years lautner magazine had a milkman calf advertised as an ali and milkman your looking at ali and his calves theres a smokey and turn the page hes there again under milk man

Along the same lines, isn't Ali Solution PHF in catalog and a PHAC on the website? Which is it?

Along the same lines, I was concerned about all of the bulls they are promoting are THC....Does anyone else have concerns???

Concerns? You have the right not to use these, no one is making you use a carrier if you dont want too. There are new bulls that are free too. Supply and demand and free choice.

how about last month's issue of the show circuit-- bad medicine is promoted as THF and PHAF in one ad- then couple pages back is promoted as a carrier in the other one..

The inconsistency of their promotion about defect status-- is enough to make a person question the entire outfit.  A couple times a mistake-- but in every issue?  I guess maybe the editor needs fired...

You can never know...best thing to do is contact them and find out for sure if you are truly concerned.

Call the owner and find out for sure, not that tough, mistakes in print and such happen. It would be your fault to just complain and not find out for sure before using a bull you would like to. You have never spelt something wrong?

frostback said:

Call the owner and find out for sure, not that tough, mistakes in print and such happen. It would be your fault to just complain and not find out for sure before using a bull you would like to. You have never spelt something wrong?

Click to expand...

Idealism overcomes reality every day.

Another thing I caught was in the 2012 catalog Paddy is listed as THC and PHAF, THF and PHAC in the 2010 fall update. I'm sure he is THF and PHAC

harleyhog said:

Along the same lines, I was concerned about all of the bulls they are promoting are THC....Does anyone else have concerns???

Click to expand...

In the magazine there are 31 THF PHAF bulls?

Zach said:

Another thing I caught was in the 2012 catalog Paddy is listed as THC and PHAF, THF and PHAC in the 2010 fall update. I'm sure he is THF and PHAF

Click to expand...

No  Paddy O'Malley is PHC and THF, I have alot of old catalogs that have him as PHC and I have used him alot cause I like his heifers cause they have good bone and have had PHC heifers that I sell and keep the negative ones, so I am sure he is PHC. He is THF also. Plus all the semen sales places have him PHC, they are not all wrong.

That was a typo on my part. I misspell a lot of things on my phone. Yes he is PHAC

Check out Lautner Farms blog. Corrections are noted on there.

if nothing else-- this topic caused a blog post..

I was worried for a minute. We bred a potential THC cow to Paddy last spring to avoid TH ( we haven't had her tested yet) . I was 99% sure he was TH clean. She didn't stick anyway

crybaby said:

The inconsistency of their promotion about defect status-- is enough to make a person question the entire outfit.  A couple times a mistake-- but in every issue?  I guess maybe the editor needs fired...

Click to expand...

AGREED...