Not to hijack your thread, but there is an interesting human newstory making headlines in January about a woman from the UK, Hayley Haynes (you can Google it) who was genetically born a man (has XY chromosomes), who was diagnosed with "androgen insensitivity syndrome" who just gave birth to twins. Apparently, the androgen insensitivity was great enough that she grew up a woman, with all the visible parts of a female, never knowing about having XY chromosomes until she went to a doctor at 19 to investigate why she had never begun having periods. Furthermore, the insensitivity was great enough that she actually had a tiny womb that doctors were able to make grow through hormone therapy to a point that it was functional enough to grow these two babies that were the result of an IVF cycle using donated eggs and her husband's sperm.
I think it is pertinent to your post because it appears the same mechanism is at work here, just in reverse. A lack of testosterone made a genetically XY individual female. Almost female enough to have all the working parts to reproduce as a female, but not quite, as she had to have a little help. I'm not going to get into the political debate about transgender and gender identity and all that. But it seems clear based on this modern example that hormones have quite the impact on the final outcome, does it not? I hope we can have an intelligent conversation about the medical side of this intriguing story.
Obviously in cattle at least, too much testosterone turns these free martin females who are twins to a male into something less female 90% of the time. Interesting concept when you think about it.