sex specific recombination

Help Support Steer Planet:

librarian

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
1,629
Location
Knox County Nebraska
Are these observations just the result of a reduction in alleles available for recombination or is there a possibility the male alleles are somehow evolving RESISTANCE to recombination?

Cattle Sex-Specific Recombination and Genetic Control from a Large Pedigree Analysis

Li Ma,  Jeffrey R. O'Connell,  Paul M. VanRaden,  Botong Shen,  Abinash Padhi,  Chuanyu Sun, [...view 5 more...],  George R. Wiggans
http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005387

From the discussion...
Although the biological significance for a longer male map in contrast to most mammalian species is unclear, we speculate that cattle domestication, which was estimated to have begun approximately 10,000 to 11,000 years ago [54], and the intense artificial selection targeting specific traits thereafter, could be a plausible explanation. In the past, the breeding practices in dairy cattle have put more selection pressure on bulls than on cows. Based on several theories of recombination rate evolution, this male-biased selection may lead to a higher recombination rate in bulls if selection has a direct or indirect, positive effect on recombination [55–57]. Such a pattern of a longer male map was also observed in sheep [58], which is presumed to have been domesticated during the same contemporary period as dairy was domesticated and then underwent similar male-biased selective breeding [59]. In contrast to domestic sheep, the female recombination rate of the wild bighorn sheep was reported to be 12% greater than that of the male [60].

We found a significantly decreasing trend in recombination rate in males from the analyses of recombination in the past forty years. Such decline in recombination rate in the past forty years coincided with the steady increase in milk production and decrease in fertility, a result of the intensive artificial selection in cattle breeding [47,63,64]. Although recombination generally increases selection efficiency by providing more combinations of genetic alleles [3], recombination likely was selected against in cattle breeding that predominantly occurred in males. In cattle breeding, bulls tended to carry more desired chromosomes so that a male progeny that inherited the most chromosome segments from an elite sire would have better performance and more chance to be selected for breeding. In other words, the cattle breeding favored paternal haplotypes that were not or less mixed with the maternal haplotypes during meiosis. Therefore, a sex-biased cattle breeding and selection could potentially decrease the number of recombination in a short period and likely explain the reduction of recombination rate in cattle, particularly in males. To evaluate whether the decrease in recombination rate is correlated with systematic changes in allele frequencies of associated genetic variants, we calculated the frequencies of the alleles that increase recombination rate for associated SNPs over years but found no clear patterns (S11 Fig). Inbreeding decreases the power of identifying crossovers through reducing the number of heterozygote SNPs per individual, so we adjusted for the effect of inbreeding by including the genomic inbreeding coefficient of the individual and the numbers of informative (phased heterozygote) SNPs in both the parent and offspring in a linear model. As expected, we found a negative association between inbreeding coefficient and number of recombination events in both sexes.
 

shortybreeder

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 23, 2015
Messages
476
I'm not sure how "heritable" genetic recombination is, but there are a lot of unknowns in the genetics world. This is an interesting study, but the comment of "in the past 40 years" makes me question how reliable test results were in the past?
 

librarian

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
1,629
Location
Knox County Nebraska
I'm with you okotoks, this is making my head hurt.
Here we are going along looking at pedigrees and looking at animals and trying to line up genotype with phenotype by hand and eye and these dairy guys have a CHROMOSOMAL PREDICTED TRANSMITTING ABILITIES TOOL explaining "how should you use haplotypes in your mating program?"
https://www.cdcb.us/reference/chromosomal_pta_query.html#Use
And the best hope for understanding what these haplotypes are and why they double cross each other is to wait outside the office of our steerplanet academic advisors and hope for some help.

Wouldn't this confound inbreeding coefficients?
 

knabe

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
13,639
Location
Hollister, CA
inbreeding coefficients are just numbers.  these things would just be a way to say how far they are from a theoretical number.
 

librarian

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
1,629
Location
Knox County Nebraska
As a side note, I was looking at the very amazing (to me) graphics in the Interpreting Results section of the PTA tool, and still wondering who got this figured out and how.
I saw a very small reference in the lower right corner. VanRaden et al, 2009. (with no link)
http://nce.ads.uga.edu/~ignacy/genomic-blupf90/Papers/ignacio_effic_comp.pdf
Turned out to be a paper with a bunch of math, some kind of matrix of pedigree and generation and genotype.
BUT
also by VanRaden was this paper: Why We Don't Patent
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2009.00803.x/full
 

Attachments

  • wp_ss_20151202_0001.png
    wp_ss_20151202_0001.png
    56.1 KB · Views: 126
  • wp_ss_20151202_0002.png
    wp_ss_20151202_0002.png
    58.6 KB · Views: 126
  • wp_ss_20151202_0003.png
    wp_ss_20151202_0003.png
    77.5 KB · Views: 132

Okotoks

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
3,083
librarian said:
I'm with you okotoks, this is making my head hurt.
Here we are going along looking at pedigrees and looking at animals and trying to line up genotype with phenotype by hand and eye and these dairy guys have a CHROMOSOMAL PREDICTED TRANSMITTING ABILITIES TOOL explaining "how should you use haplotypes in your mating program?"
https://www.cdcb.us/reference/chromosomal_pta_query.html#Use
And the best hope for understanding what these haplotypes are and why they double cross each other is to wait outside the office of our steerplanet academic advisors and hope for some help.

Wouldn't this confound inbreeding coefficients?
After giving this some thought it does help explain a few things. We often see bulls that don't resemble their ancestry in phenotype and when they don't breed true it doesn't surprise us. The more interesting ones are the bulls of basically outcross pedigrees that are prepotent game changers in a breed. In shorthorns two famous bulls come to mind, Champion of England and Whitehall Sultan. Whatever genetic combinations they ended up with they both became the sires of their day and influenced the breed for generations. 
 

librarian

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
1,629
Location
Knox County Nebraska
I can see how this information could really speed things up. As it is, it takes a lifetime to figure things out and then another lifetime to see the results.
But then again, there can be no great gain without some loss. Diversity is at risk. Hopefully, somewhere, some cattle will endure through environmental selection as a control on the traits we prioritize through economic selection.
 

HerefordGuy

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
442
Location
Sturgeon, MO
shortybreeder said:
I'm not sure how "heritable" genetic recombination is, but there are a lot of unknowns in the genetics world. This is an interesting study, but the comment of "in the past 40 years" makes me question how reliable test results were in the past?

Cryopreserved semen genotypes really well. The bulls from 40 years ago were genotyped in the last 6 years with the new SNP tests.
So, the measures of recombination rate are quite accurate. They also adjusted for things like inbreeding that would influence their ability to measure recombination.

So, there is no question about the reliability of the test.
 

HerefordGuy

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
442
Location
Sturgeon, MO
librarian said:
Are these observations just the result of a reduction in alleles available for recombination or is there a possibility the male alleles are somehow evolving RESISTANCE to recombination?

Cattle Sex-Specific Recombination and Genetic Control from a Large Pedigree Analysis

Li Ma,  Jeffrey R. O'Connell,  Paul M. VanRaden,  Botong Shen,  Abinash Padhi,  Chuanyu Sun, [...view 5 more...],  George R. Wiggans
http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005387

From the discussion...
Although the biological significance for a longer male map in contrast to most mammalian species is unclear, we speculate that cattle domestication, which was estimated to have begun approximately 10,000 to 11,000 years ago [54], and the intense artificial selection targeting specific traits thereafter, could be a plausible explanation. In the past, the breeding practices in dairy cattle have put more selection pressure on bulls than on cows. Based on several theories of recombination rate evolution, this male-biased selection may lead to a higher recombination rate in bulls if selection has a direct or indirect, positive effect on recombination [55–57]. Such a pattern of a longer male map was also observed in sheep [58], which is presumed to have been domesticated during the same contemporary period as dairy was domesticated and then underwent similar male-biased selective breeding [59]. In contrast to domestic sheep, the female recombination rate of the wild bighorn sheep was reported to be 12% greater than that of the male [60].

We found a significantly decreasing trend in recombination rate in males from the analyses of recombination in the past forty years. Such decline in recombination rate in the past forty years coincided with the steady increase in milk production and decrease in fertility, a result of the intensive artificial selection in cattle breeding [47,63,64]. Although recombination generally increases selection efficiency by providing more combinations of genetic alleles [3], recombination likely was selected against in cattle breeding that predominantly occurred in males. In cattle breeding, bulls tended to carry more desired chromosomes so that a male progeny that inherited the most chromosome segments from an elite sire would have better performance and more chance to be selected for breeding. In other words, the cattle breeding favored paternal haplotypes that were not or less mixed with the maternal haplotypes during meiosis. Therefore, a sex-biased cattle breeding and selection could potentially decrease the number of recombination in a short period and likely explain the reduction of recombination rate in cattle, particularly in males. To evaluate whether the decrease in recombination rate is correlated with systematic changes in allele frequencies of associated genetic variants, we calculated the frequencies of the alleles that increase recombination rate for associated SNPs over years but found no clear patterns (S11 Fig). Inbreeding decreases the power of identifying crossovers through reducing the number of heterozygote SNPs per individual, so we adjusted for the effect of inbreeding by including the genomic inbreeding coefficient of the individual and the numbers of informative (phased heterozygote) SNPs in both the parent and offspring in a linear model. As expected, we found a negative association between inbreeding coefficient and number of recombination events in both sexes.

There are proteins (cellular machinery) that are responsible for recombination rates. Because recombination rate is heritable, we can select for organisms that have recombination more or less frequently. This is global recombination.

We also have recombination hot spots. This is when a protein, PRDM9, recognizes a particular DNA sequence and causes recombination to happen at that location. But, when recombination happens at that location it can destroy the DNA sequence that PRDM9 recognizes. This is in hot spot recombination.
 

HerefordGuy

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
442
Location
Sturgeon, MO
Okotoks said:
knabe said:
I need help with the explanation in the article " Again, this is based on the proportions of their current chromosomes coming from their sires and their dams" Doesn't an animal get 50% of their chromosomes from each parent? I am probably totally missing the point!

They are graphing the genetic merit. So, if on chromosome 1, a bull has a value of $50, and the gene effects from his dam were worth $10 and the gene effects from his sire are worth $40. He still got 50% of his DNA from dam and sire, it is measure what is the performance/merit/value associated with the DNA inherited from dam and sire.
We could make that mating a second time, and the full sibling could have a value of -$10 on chromosome 1 with gene effect from his dam worth $20 and gene effects from his sire worth -$20.

This is a different way to visualize the random shuffle of genes.

http://blog.steakgenomics.org/2015/09/the-random-shuffle-of-genes-putting-e.html
 

librarian

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
1,629
Location
Knox County Nebraska
HG-
I am smart enough to recognize this is fascinating, but not smart enough to grasp how it works.
Those PRDM9 proteins sound like trouble makers.

 

HerefordGuy

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
442
Location
Sturgeon, MO
librarian said:
HG-
I am smart enough to recognize this is fascinating, but not smart enough to grasp how it works.
Those PRDM9 proteins sound like trouble makers.
Recombination serves an important function. It helps makes sure that matching chromosomes pair up. Recombination helps make sure chromosome 1 inherited from your father matches up with chromosome 1 from your mother during cell divisions (mitosis and meiosis), rather than chromosome 1 pairing up with chromosome 2, etc.
Recombination also shuffles genes between generations. This allows linkages between bad variants and good variants to be broken up over time.

So, some recombination is a good thing.

PRDM9 is part of the machinery that makes this happen. But, not all species have functional PRDM9 proteins. Dogs do not have functional PRDM9 proteins. Evolution takes some weird twists and turns!
 

Latest posts

Top