librarian
Well-known member
https://archive.org/stream/alphabeticalarra00beev#page/n3/mode/2up
Buried amid a lot of not so compelling material in this book, are many small stories and descriptions of animals, breeders and their experiments that are unusually candid.
Also interesting is that, even then, some referred to Shorthorns as Bos composita
I'm not sure what history the author is allluding to, about the cosmopollitan breed being "But a relic of the herds of the Religious Houses". I have never read that Shorthorns were an amalgamation of the best of all breeds brought across the North Sea by Cistercion Monks.
Nothing surprises me though, about how illustrious this breed is reported to be.
He asserts that a successful cross with foreign blood (something Continental for instance) may be but a "happy re-union of elements borrowed and lent in days gone by."
That part rings true.
Buried amid a lot of not so compelling material in this book, are many small stories and descriptions of animals, breeders and their experiments that are unusually candid.
Also interesting is that, even then, some referred to Shorthorns as Bos composita
I'm not sure what history the author is allluding to, about the cosmopollitan breed being "But a relic of the herds of the Religious Houses". I have never read that Shorthorns were an amalgamation of the best of all breeds brought across the North Sea by Cistercion Monks.
Nothing surprises me though, about how illustrious this breed is reported to be.
He asserts that a successful cross with foreign blood (something Continental for instance) may be but a "happy re-union of elements borrowed and lent in days gone by."
That part rings true.