muleman
Well-known member
opinions
I second that. When full sibs/flush mates can differ so much at times I can't think that there is a difference between the clones.BadgerFan said:Any differences in full sibs or flush mates by Heatwave versus a clone is due to the inevitable inconsistency of a four or five way cross bull not the tiny difference in mitochondrial DNA. One clone siring more winners than another is due to chance. So to sum it up, my opinion is that there is no significant genetic difference between clones.
vet tech said:I agree with fan and drl on this one. Ultimately, they are the same dang thing, ur just paying way too much for the original HW instead of a 30 dollar clone.
bc its the "original" HW. hey whatever if they want to pay a lot for the "original" then thats fine. I just get the clone, its worked fine for mehntwhitetail said:vet tech said:I agree with fan and drl on this one. Ultimately, they are the same dang thing, ur just paying way too much for the original HW instead of a 30 dollar clone.
Then why would people pay for the original, when you can get the clone @ a fraction? Also, why would they clone monopoly? .... must be making $$ on volume is the only thing I can think of...
hntwhitetail said:vet tech said:I agree with fan and drl on this one. Ultimately, they are the same dang thing, ur just paying way too much for the original HW instead of a 30 dollar clone.
Then why would people pay for the original, when you can get the clone @ a fraction? Also, why would they clone monopoly? .... must be making $$ on volume is the only thing I can think of...