LN said:
The ASA even instituted a new policy last year that if data submitted by producers looks too good to be true, then it will be thrown out of the genetic evaluation.
And there is such a thing as accurate EPDs when thousands of progeny from almost as many producers is reported.
I'm right there with you LN! We report ACCURATE numbers on our animals, to lie would just blow up in our face later down the road. We produce seed stock, not show steers. Numbers are VERY important to us. It is not the only tool we use, but when we use 100% AI, they are extremely important. The family that got us involved in this wonderful breed taught us about honesty and how important it is! They sell August 31st calves just as much as September calves, and both are good! They even had an August heifer (600 U breeding) place in the top 20 at Nationals in Missouri this last year, just to prove she could win on her own merits! I have met too many people with this breed that are just that, open and honest. It is harder to keep track of lies than being honest from day one!
Sorry Dixieland, but your suspicion of the ASA EPD's makes me wonder how honest you are on your reporting of numbers. Considering you are promoting a bull yourself, I'd be careful.