CA, CDC, polio

Help Support Steer Planet:

Sir Loin

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
72
Location
SE Tenn
3-4-2014
No 'easy answers' in treating rare 'polio-like' illness
a virus, maybe, or a toxin — is causing rare cases of sudden paralysis in children.
http://www.thestar.com/news/world/2014/ ... ornia.html


Polio-like paralysis in California children alarms govt
Sen. Boxer sent a letter to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) late last week, urging the agency to consider whether the illness is related to a virus or environmental matters, and if there have been similar reports of such paralysis outside of her home state of California.
http://rt.com/usa/polio-paralysis-calif ... ldren-692/


That's the first time I have seen them consider a “toxin “ & “environmental matters “as a possible cause. I wonder what “ toxin “ and “environmental matters “ may be under consideration.
The rest of the article sounds a lot like an attempt at a coverup to me .
This doesn't sound good people!


Looks like Sen. Boxer may be on to something here!

and if there have been similar reports of such paralysis outside of her home state of California.
http://rt.com/usa/polio-paralysis-calif ... ldren-692/
The sulfur issue, for example, popped up in two states this past year,
http://www.ethanolproducer.com/articles ... ends-north
 

DakotaCow

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 25, 2008
Messages
407
I already suggested backing the kids off the distiller grains and supplementing them in other ways. The death is in the dose. We drink toxic substance every day, water can be deadly. Google it!
 

BTDT

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
443
I have ask you politely to tell us your real name and the lawsuit and what it involves.  Since "polite" didn't work, I will try this:

Either tell us your real name, agenda, and the lawsuit OR SHUT THE HE** UP. (I know you have an agenda and a lawsuit; I am kind of good at sniffing those out!)

Jason, if he is not going to play by your rules then I would support a ban.
 

Sir Loin

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
72
Location
SE Tenn
Federal program aims to make pet food, livestock feed safer

By P.J. Huffstutter
Fri Feb 28, 2014 5:44pm EST
(Reuters) - A new federal program aims to standardize inspection procedures for pet food and farm animal feed produced in the United States, making them safer, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said on Friday.
The Animal Feed Regulatory Program Standards comprise a series of new voluntary standards for inspections by state and other regulatory programs that oversee the production of pet food and feed for farm animals such as cattle, chickens and pigs.
Concern over the safety of pet food and farm animal feed has mounted in recent years, as discoveries of salmonella-contaminated dog food and livestock feed contaminated with a corn-based toxin led to waves of product recalls and worries about the safety of the U.S. food production system.
 

knabe

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
13,639
Location
Hollister, CA
voluntary today, mandatory tomorrow.


we get it.  you are a big government statist.


can you list 3 areas where you think the government shouldn't get involved with regulation, specifically at the federal level?


maybe you can list an area where regulation could be streamlined so small business has a competitive neutral position with large corporations?
 

Sir Loin

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
72
Location
SE Tenn
News reports a week ago said anonymous sources indicated the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) had evidence that some of the 8.7 million pounds of meat came from animals with eye cancer. On Wednesday, the Los Angeles Times confirmed those stories with documents received through the Freedom of Information Act.    
Regulators wrote that they had found two cattle heads with eye cancer and that some of the meat shipped was “likely affected with epithelioma of the eye.” Federal investigators told the Santa Rosa Press Democrat that the heads were cut off to remove the evidence.
The USDA has announced that, in an unusual move, it is conducting a criminal investigation and may actually hold someone accountable. [/quote]
http://www.allgov.com/usa/ca/news/california-and-the-nation/shuttered-slaughterhouse-sold-meat-from-cows-with-eye-cancer-140306?news=852614
 

Sir Loin

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
72
Location
SE Tenn
FYI:
Was Massive Beef Recall Caused By Dairy Cows With Eye Cancer?



We know that millions of pounds of beef that came through a California slaughterhouse and meat processing plant have been recalled because the plant “processed diseased and unsound animals.” Well, okay, but what does that mean? We don’t know that for sure yet, but the Village Voice talked to one rancher whose entire 2013 output is part of that massive recall.
Hannah Palmer Egan wanted to know: what “disease” did those animals have? What, exactly, made them unfit for human consumption?
Bill Niman of BN Ranch used the plant, Rancho Feeding Corp., for the slaughter of his cattle, and has spoken to other local people in the industry. He points out that Rancho happens to process retired dairy cows, which tend to be older and thus sicker than the relative youngsters raised for meat. One disease that’s obvious to inspectors and should be obvious to farmers is ocular squamous cell carcinoma. Simply put: cancer eye. (Click here for pictures, but don’t say you weren’t warned. You’ll see why these tumors should be obvious to farmers before they send the cows for slaughter.)
This cancer exists in a variety of animals–people get it, too–but is common in certain breeds of cattle for some reason that farmers would really, really like to figure out and prevent.
Niman wonders whether dairy farmers sent over cows with cancer eye, and the proper procedure wasn’t followed. A USDA veterinarian is supposed to check whether the cancer has spread and how far, and determine whether the cancer-free parts of the cow’s body can still be butchered and sold. A longtime USDA inspector told Egan that if the process isn’t followed precisely, that renders the whole carcass “unfit for human consumption.”
Other experts–who, for transparency’s sake, are small-scale butchers and farmers–point out that while the huge recall figures make us picture Dumpsters full of beef heading for the incinerator, most of the meat in these recalls has already been distributed and won’t be recovered.
The “disease” could be ocular cancer, or could be something else. We don’t know, because the USDA won’t elaborate yet, Rancho’s lawyers quite understandably won’t let employees talk to the media.
The recall probably won’t hurt Nestlé so much in the long run, but Niman says that losing all of his 2013 beef could destroy his business. Rancho handled slaughter for many small-scale meat producers in the Bay Area, who will have to haul their animals to more distant slaughterhouses if the facility shuts down.

http://consumerist.com/2014/02/21/was-m ... ye-cancer/
 

DakotaCow

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 25, 2008
Messages
407
Im guessing a couple of them had hereford in them and theres your problem....at least they didnt prolapse on the way to the plant.
 

knabe

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
13,639
Location
Hollister, CA
The beef processing industry needs to clean up its act. Slaughterhouses need the authority and or will power along w dairy industry to deal with marginal animals.

It's almost as if a rendering truck should be on call and seller has to agree that any animal can go with renderer and cost of that goes to slaughterhouse first.

Anti meat crowd needs to be in on it though they will be agoanst it but everyone needs to accept reality and choice.
 

Sir Loin

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
72
Location
SE Tenn
Knabe,
Re:
The beef processing industry needs to clean up its act.
I couldn't agree with you more and just maybe this case will bring it about.

As it seems those involved in this case are already lawyer_ing up, I expect the farmer will end up as the guilty party for producing and shipping the cattle.
But with a little luck his attn. Will learn the true cause of the condition of those cows ( PEM ) and pass the blame to where it really belongs.

The only good thing I can see coming out of this mess is, all the facts will be uncovered and put on public record for all to see.
SL
 

knabe

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
13,639
Location
Hollister, CA
It's doubtful anyone's life can withstand all the facts for everyone to see.

Careful what you ask for.  We are on a slippery slope that no one can live up to.

Your attitude is the very reason societies unfold and in the long run, the largest cause of violence.
 

CAB

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
5,607
Location
Corning,Iowa
Yes anyone that has been around any amount of cattle for any amount of time has seen a cow with cancer eye and we all know that it could not be a very big % of the cows slaughtered there were afflicted with the disease. FYI, you can trim the effected area and still harvest product as long as an inspector is available to decide how much of the area needs to be canned. Just because a cow may be older does not mean that she is not 100% healthy. IDK, but Sir Loin you are starting to sound more and more like a fanatic with everything that you post and seem to be associated with some type of a group with an agenda. JMO
 

Sir Loin

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
72
Location
SE Tenn
CAB,
Sir Loin you are starting to sound more and more like a fanatic with everything that you post and seem to be associated with some type of a group with an agenda.
Believe me, I have no agenda except to warn others of the pending continued train wreck I see coming.
After 5 years of research and 4 field test it's hard not to want to warn others, especially when children lives are at stake.
After seeing far to many cows and calves getting sick and dying and after vet bill after vet bill and several necropolises and getting no answer except it's polio, I decided to do my own investigation.
This is where I got my start.
http://www.leagle.com/decision/1981978648F2d330_1931.xml/NEWMAN%20v.%20A.%20E.%20STALEY%20MFG.%20CO.

And now. after 5 years of research, I am reading about children being paralyzed for life by an unknown illness.
You tell me, should I make my findings known or just keep quiet ?
Now this monkey I have had on my back for 5 years is on your back.
What should I do?
SL
 

knabe

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
13,639
Location
Hollister, CA
Whenever it's about the "children" you can bet that's code words for for regulation.

It's the left's calling card.
 

Sir Loin

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
72
Location
SE Tenn
Knabe,
Re:
Whenever it's about the "children" you can bet that's code words for for regulation.
It's the left's calling card.

You are correct. They have used kids and cried WOLF so many times, now when some one really sees a wolf, no one listens.

Here is a pic of one of my field test calves that even Lucky_P says was born blind from “ failure of passive of maternal antibiotics”.

  Lucky_P
Calves with failure of passive transfer of maternal antibodies can sometimes develop hypopyon/uveitis/ophthalmitis as a result of bacterial septicemia.
SL

http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa294/SirLoin_01/blind%20calf%20%20IMR/100_0173.jpg

http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa294/SirLoin_01/blind%20calf%20%20IMR/100_0178.jpg


 

OH Breeder

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 14, 2007
Messages
5,954
Location
Ada, Ohio
Here is a pic of one of my field test calves that even Lucky_P says was born blind from “ failure of passive of maternal antibiotics”.

  Lucky_P
Calves with failure of passive transfer of maternal antibodies can sometimes develop hypopyon/uveitis/ophthalmitis as a result of bacterial septicemia.
SL

http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa294/SirLoin_01/blind%20calf%20%20IMR/100_0173.jpg

http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa294/SirLoin_01/blind%20calf%20%20IMR/100_0178.jpg
[/quote]


He said "ANTIBODIES" not ANITBIOTICS.
Cause of blindness was Bacterial Septicemia big difference in Antibiotics and Antibodies.
Do you intentional manupulate quotes? Or is your understanding that an antibody is the same as antibiotics. I just feel AGAIN you are grasping at straws trying to come up with some cross species contamination???
 
Top