Honestly, no. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and that is what you are getting on here. No matter your credentials, your opinion is your opinion. For any treatment to be labeled effective, there must be studies- extensive double blind studies, proving that the specific treatment in question is effective at relieving or curing a specific disease or condition and is
statistically significant and is
repeatable .
And there are no studies supporting Chiropractors are effective at treating diseases in animals. If it were effective, there would be statistical support. This is the most basic principle of science. Throw this out the door as most alternative medicine proponents want, and you have to chunk all known science with it. Can't change the rules to fit what you want.
In Texas, the board of veterinary medical examiners have gone as far as requiring a signed acknowledgment by the owner or other caretaker of an animal, that chiropractic care is considered by Texas law to be an alternate (nonstandard) therapy. (
http://info.sos.state.tx.us/pls/pub/readtac$ext.TacPage?sl=R&app=9&p_dir=&p_rloc=&p_tloc=&p_ploc=&pg=1&p_tac=&ti=22&pt=24&ch=573&rl=12)
That says a lot to me right there.
My personal belief is that time will heal a lot of injuries, and Chiropractors are willing to take the credit.
I know one of the country's most talented equine surgeon very well. We got into a discussion about this one day. I asked him if he would ever refer someone to a Chiropractor. He replied that some people you can't argue with. If they believe it works, I let them waste their money. When they get tired of that, I fix the problem.
Chiropractic shenanigans and the fact that you can market any nutritional supplement with having 0% to 2000% of what it claims to have on the label is legal, since they are not FDA regulated and apparently honesty in advertising does not apply, are my pet peeves. Stepping off the soap box now.