read david hume, adam smith karl marx, concepts about the "tragedy of the commons", read about thomas jefferson on states rights before he was president and see what he did after he was president. college today is not challenging in terms of economic principles. it is too wedded to sentimental imperialism. read any book by nial ferguson http://www.niallferguson.org/
in general, challenge yourself and don't rely on teachers to do that. that said, don't allow your challenging yourself interfere with you limited exposure to facts interfere with their regurgitation on tests.
what are your goals. they seem to be
change voters perceptions about issues so that free markets influence decisions as oppossed to idealism
educating city folk. this is a difficult prospect with words alone, they need experience for empathy.
your analogy with BST is flawed. a free market will set a price equilibrium, not arbitrary notions of what an affordable price is. find out what a free market really is.
what is appreciation? money, less restrictive laws, more people in ag, hunter gatherer lifestyle.
what effective consumer educators are out there that you admire and are effective with your goals in mind
you should not focus in school, that's what grad school is for where you will be the world's expert on whatever thesis you choose to defend. this alone will motivate you to rationalize it's tenet.
working hard is not enough, working smart isn't enough. keeping your feet (brain moving) is.
find out what a ponzi scheme the american economic structure is
find out what subsidies do, then try and educate ag, not city folks their damage.
i'm thinking more and more we don't need to educate others, we need to develope successful business models as a means to tell others what to do. people are soooooooo caught up in telling others what to do that i think they have a major for it and it's called child development. child development is simply a major that seeks to extinguish independent thought of human beings as quickly as possible by setting rules, parameters, limits on a perfect brain for discovery to fit our needs. if you watch a child or baby anything, they are a sponge and those that stay a sponge the longest become independent thinkers. we don't like these people because they challenge us, so we extinguish that flame as soon as possible. watch how a kid works, watch how they get feedback, see how they digest what works, crying is the easiest example. test how fast you can get a child who is crying and you know it to be manipulative because at first crying is for hunger or pain, then is used for dependence, comfort, things that are addicctive, ie sugar. this can beocme a game. you will notice a little switch goes on and off in a child the instance they know the technique is not working. watch a kid learn music and watch their eyes dialate. this is called being in the zone. get in the zone, these are called soft eyes. you have only begun, you are not ending your learning. respect is unnecessary. get over your obsession with how dumb other people are. this is only mild name calling and useless. perhaps an avenue to pursue is law and the effect of outlawing anything in general.
i leave you with a quote by richard weaver
he "that accepts the reemmediability of a certain amount of evil and tries to fence it around instead of trying to stamp it out and thereby spreading it. His is a classical asknowledgement of tragedy and of the limits of power." this conundrum is the impetus for war. it basically started WWII.
ok, one more thing http://www.vega.org.uk/ it's a site of RETIRED people so don't think you can pay for health insurance on a salary working for them. go discover, don't educate, it's what you are here for. it's where we are going.