ultimate consequence of allowing losers to win.
Mamphela Ramphele’s attempt to give the so-called employment equity system some credibility should be deemed a failure.
The damage has already been done and the civil service, public healthcare, the railways, ports and road infrastructure bear testimony to the insidious effects of racial preference on South Africa.
The current system of race preferences in favour of blacks cannot be reformed — it can only be abolished.
Employment equity is but an Orwellian euphemism denying whites employment, as well as educational and business opportunities, on the grounds of race.
The ANC may be more subtle than Zanu-PF, but the ultimate goal is the same — getting rid of whites altogether. Most whites, English and Afrikaans, have seen the writing on the wall. (in america, it IS successful people)
They have either left the country or have become self-employed, waging a constant struggle for survival in small businesses run from homes and garages without pension schemes, medical aid or access to capital, which is largely reserved for blacks.
According to economist Mike Schussler, 50% of all white males are self-employed. It is a staggering statistic.
Not only are whites made to feel distinctly unwelcome at government departments, but banks and other private institutions have also transformed to the extent that one hardly sees a white face behind a counter. In fact, we would need an affirmative action policy for whites just to persuade large corporations to employ them at all, especially young ones, given the anti-white ethos that oozes from the very pores of this amazingly violent, corrupt society.
Whites lacking in entrepreneurial and technical skills have been condemned to poverty and despair, despite being literate and hard-working.
On the other hand, one-third of all municipal councillors controlling budgets in the billions are illiterate.
To create wealth, one needs skills.
To loot the wealth of others does not require any skill, except being ruthless and arrogant.
The race-proud Africans of Zimbabwe and South Africa have shown themselves to possess an abundant capacity for both. — Dan Roodt, via e-mail
here's more subsidies we can do without.
http://www.rand.org/news/press/2008/09/08/index.html
Hickman and co-author Marika Suttorp of RAND found that 73 percent of the previously deported immigrants were rearrested within a year of jail release, compared to 32 percent of the other deportable immigrants. Previously deported immigrants also were arrested more frequently, with 28 percent rearrested three or more times within a year of release, compared to 7 percent among deportable immigrants who had not previously been expelled from the United States.
The RAND study excluded immigrants who were sent from Los Angeles jails to state prisons or were transferred to the custody of immigration officials. if they included them, it would be worse.
when our elected officials are gunned down, we actually have become what we subsidize.
Councilman shot - Fairfield stunned
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/09/02/MNEK12MJSP.DTL
here's more subsidy.
http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_10407035?source=email
when you are dead, you can't subsidize anything. the womb, the ultimate weapon. (a quote from mohammed and aztlan proponents)
............( quiters are losers to some as well, i suppose ).....i graduated from a school that now has a 30% academic ineligable ratio which disqualifies them from band/football/ basketball/debate/ect.......cause the " "winners" running the system deem them "losers"....so our young are wearing there "loser" uniforms given to them by some real "smart" "winners" already......they could go 0-10 this year.....they had 19 kids in the band last year....this year they don't have a band........how many kids are academicaly ineligalbe in your alls local high schools ?? how many were there in your graduating year???......we all probally dont know cause they didnt have " winners" back tthen tellin us that the losers needed pointed out and stifilied strarting when they start public funded school. so if we're stuck with a generation with a high percentage of "losers", they got it honestly....... used to be a football coaches job to field the best team he could.....and it was "his" job to motivate a football player, unmotivated for what ever reason, to bring out the kids talents that motivated him/her to accel in other areas....scolastic as well as preparing him for adult life....now its a bunch of superenindent "winners" job to isolate and lablel them. ...hows that workin out for everone? is it getting easier to spot the losers ???....once we get em all labeled and counted then what's the plan to do with em??? maybe we can go back to seperate bathrooms and seats on the bus for em......take away there rights to vote?? or own property?....losers surely dont deserve those same rights as us winners do.....it makes my heart sink to think of someone reading this and there kid has been put in this position by todays society....what do you tell a kid when they cant do something there good at ....cause they dont come up to the "winners" level at somthing else........its real important to some people to surround themselves with only " winners"...and impress on others what it takes to be a "winner"...sounds like a line in the dirt to me....i think a winner is the one that wouldnt mind sittin on the bus with any of em".....jbarl