knabe
Well-known member
i attended our local "surf n turf" show out here in CA. pretty small, well, really small. i think there was less than 10 in AOB heifer class and steers. only 2 kids locally, rest from up to 200 miles away. anyway, there was a few extremely fat bred heifers with more tail head fat on them then my fat steers. i asked one exhibitor if he thought his heifer was too fat as i had never seen heifer that fat. the fat was at least 10 inches front to back and at least 1.5 inches thick., maybe more. he said he was feeding her oats, hay, soaked sugar beet meal. said she was safe in calf for two months. he said the judges had liked her as she was reserve at a couple of shows. so when the judge lined them up in her class, as well as others he used a couple of terms i felt were not helpful for the exhibitors. maybe i'm wrong.
not athletic enough = too fat, can't walk in their tracks, limited pasture exposure for exercise
combines the most good = overall low quality class, i'm probably too picky on this one.
i realize sometimes, particularly at the smaller shows, you want to keep mostly positive.
what other terms out there should be changed/eliminated to help the exhibitors?
another thing the judge did i felt was good is he individually spent a couple moments with EVERY exhibitor off mike. intermediate showmanship was the toughest class. it was between a gal who showed better than her animal did, ie she set up good every time but her animal wouldn't, and the guy who won, who didn't have quite the style of the gal (not being sexist here), but set up extremely fast, was efficient and did a great job not getting cramped and hidden by other exhibitors. it seemed the biggest mistakes people made were getting too close to the animal in front of them, so when the person behind them crowded them, they didn't have any room to adjust as they mostly moved forward to set up their feet, as they didn't have any room to move back. granted, the ring was too small, but hey, it's showmanship.
not athletic enough = too fat, can't walk in their tracks, limited pasture exposure for exercise
combines the most good = overall low quality class, i'm probably too picky on this one.
i realize sometimes, particularly at the smaller shows, you want to keep mostly positive.
what other terms out there should be changed/eliminated to help the exhibitors?
another thing the judge did i felt was good is he individually spent a couple moments with EVERY exhibitor off mike. intermediate showmanship was the toughest class. it was between a gal who showed better than her animal did, ie she set up good every time but her animal wouldn't, and the guy who won, who didn't have quite the style of the gal (not being sexist here), but set up extremely fast, was efficient and did a great job not getting cramped and hidden by other exhibitors. it seemed the biggest mistakes people made were getting too close to the animal in front of them, so when the person behind them crowded them, they didn't have any room to adjust as they mostly moved forward to set up their feet, as they didn't have any room to move back. granted, the ring was too small, but hey, it's showmanship.