-XBAR- said:
Your scientific method has two huge flaws in it.
1) the CE and BW epds of low accuracy (99% of the breed) bulls are fabricated from generations past and aren't reflective of the individuals performance much less the progeny's.
2) Asterick free genetics are no more pure shorthorn than most other non asterick genetics. It's a marketing tool- that's it.
I realise that and should maybe have put in either

or <beer> after my first sentence!
That aside, S. Ultra 12J having top 1% for CE, BW and $CEZ with 143 progeny, his sire S. Wholesale 114W having 2%, 2% and 10% respectively, albeit with lower accuracy, and his dam being below breed average for CE and BW persuaded me to try him.
These figures compare very favourably with JSF Gauge and therefore, working with what I have at my disposal, EPD wise, I committed myself.
As far as the asterisk thing goes, it is a personal preference. I have used asterisk bulls in the past when I couldn't get asterisk free, but would have preferred not to. I realise that pedigrees may have been manipulated, wittingly or unwittingly, in the past but that is a legacy we all have to live with!