Why is big bad?

Help Support Steer Planet:

HAFarm

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 31, 2008
Messages
53
Location
North Carolina
GONEWEST said:

When the those elephant ads came out their were Angus bulls at Louisville that could step over the other breeds "Elephant" bulls.

The Angus show animals haven't been the best example of what our breed stands for, although I think this is changing somewhat.  I remember when we wanted to compete and had heifers that were 8 frame or so we called the functional cattle "production Angus".  Now all we have are production angus.  So to compare a few show animals at Louisville that could step over others breeds that is not an accurate representation of our breed.  I feel Angus are the best breed but I also think we do the best advertisement and the elephant in the box was just the one of many successful ad campaigns.
 

aj

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
6,423
Location
western kansas
There is alot of antedotal evidence on here. I read once that the indicator of profitis "pounds weaned per cow exposed". This includes fertility,growth calving ease and on and on. I|'m not sure  a 800# weaned ave weight is a profit indicator if you have a 20% death loss to to dystocia. I went to a county fair where the weight range on fat cattle went from 950# to 1595#. There were some huge steers there. Most of them were homegrown.I think the commercial herds have seen frame score creep and that cow size has gotten to large. If you are in an area where cornstalks are available I think bigger cows can work in these areas. I have seen big cows come off weaning thin and then add 200# to there condition over the winter for basically nothing as far as cost is concerned. I like the smaller cows. They tend to have as big as calves as the big cows most of the time. Most big commercial operations run a strict program. If they don't breed back they are gone. If the don't calve on their own they are dead. I think if natural selection is practiced the smaller cows tend to float to the top.
 

TJ

Well-known member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
2,036
GONEWEST said:
My next door neighbors (Baird's) had about 200 cows of "that breed" & they weaned mostly 700 - 800 lb. calves every fall, they even had one that approached 1,000 that made the one in my pic look puny.  My dad also has "that breed" & while that calf is certainly one of the bigger one's, it wasn't our biggest ever.    Actually, I've still got several pics of multiple cows with calves over 60% of their body weight, they just aren't digital.  Pretty sure that OFS has seen some of them.  The biggest reason why I have that particular pic in a digital format is because it was my own cow that I bought at a sale in Virginia & I used it in advertising back in the day.  BTW, Kit Pharo has lots of pics of smaller cows with calves that weaned 60+% of their body weight.  Weaning 60+% of a cows body weight isn't really all that uncommon.  This fall I'll go shoot you several pics from one of my dad's herds.      

yeah.........ok. So hwy do you think it is that Tarentaise aren't the number one breed on the planet? I remember they were brought in the same time as Simmentals, Blondes, Normandy's, Limousin's, etc. Why haven't they florished if they are so efficient.

Again, to me, % of a cows body weight weaned is a poor measure of efficiency. If a 700 pound cow weans a 450 pound calf, what's the big deal in that?

That's easy to answer... because efficiency wasn't considered "sexy" during the 80's... frame size & extreme growth was.  However, most of the Tarentaise cattle were moderate framed, so the "high dollar rollers" weren't as interested in investing in them as they were in the "bigger stuff".  Nobody wanted 1,700-1,800 lb. bulls (like many Tarentaise were), they wanted 2,500+ lb. bulls!  Tarentaise Cattle came over at the wrong time & were promoted at the wrong time.  Moderate frame size wasn't cool in the late 70's & during the 1980's... just look that the pics of any champion steer for proof.   ;)  Also, many Tarentaise breeders tried to change the breed to make them bigger.  I suspect & I have heard rumors that Gelbveih & Simmental were slipped into the Tarentaise breed in an effort to increase frame size & growth.  Making matters worse, black was the color of choice & the Tarentaise breed as a whole, was dead set against black.  Tarentaise were almost Jersey colored & that hurt them probably more than anything else!  It wasn't until the late 1990's until black cattle were allowed to show in the Tarentaise shows.  Not allowing black cattle to show, caused many of the top breeders to get out of the breed because the commercial guys wanted black, but the top breeders also wanted to show.  Right or wrong, in the 80's & 90's, the vast majority of buyers wanted black cattle.  Red & other colors are much more acceptable now, but there is still a basis towards black cattle & Jersey colored cattle are automatically behind the 8 ball.  Leachman's once wrote something like this about a pen of Tarentaise composites that they were selling in their sale... (paraphased from memory) "How long will you let prejudice & tradition stand in your way of progess & profit?".  I think that they nailed your answer.                     

Actually they have flourished more than you probably know, it's just that they have flourished in composite combinations, not as purebreds.  3 years in a row, Tarentaise X Angus females were the high selling commercial pen of females in the Yards at Denver.  2 times they were Grand Champion pen of 10 & the other year they were Res. Grand Champion pen.  Leachman's used Tarentaise in some of their composites, Oregon Country Beef/Hatfield's High Desert Ranch used them in all of their composites (I think that they have 20,000+ Tarentaise composite cows in their alliance right now), Kit Pharo used them in his composites, also, Padlock Ranch bought semen from us to use in their composite program.  Galen Fink (sat in front of him at a Tarentaise sale in Bismark, North Dakota where he bought a few head in the 1990's) used Tarentaise on a limited basis in a composite program.  My uncle, Dale Lovell, who was a former President of the KY Beef Cattle Association & who ran the UK Ag Farm for several years, has used Tarentaise for years in his commercial herd.  Those are some pretty big names in the commercial beef industry & they live all over the USA.  I suspect that a lot of cattle have Tarentaise influence & many people either don't know it or don't admit to it.   ;)   In the 1990's there were probably 1,000+ head of Tarentaise females in our county alone (and we are considered to be apart of the corn belt where pasture is hard to find).  The Baird's (actually it's just Phillip Baird now) still have a lot of Tarentaise influence, but they are also using Angus & now have more of a Angus X Tarentaise composite herd.  Ankenman Ranch in OK still has several hundred Tarentaise cows.  Hat Ranch Alliance in Iowa, still has a bunch of Tarentaise in their Angus & Tarentaise composite alliance of coop herds.  Tarentaise are awful good cattle in a composite program.  1/4 - 1/2 Tarentaise makes a super mother cow, so most of the Tarentaise are composite cattle.  There aren't many Tarentaise breeders left, but their are lots of commercial breeders using Tarentaise influenced females in their herds. 

However, this issue isn't about Tarentaise... it's all about cow size & efficiency.  Tarentaise are just one of several examples.  Lots of 1,000 lb. cows wean 600 - 700 lb. calves.   That's the bottom line & you don't have to have Tarentaise genetics in order to do that.  All you need is an efficient cow that can milk enough to raise that weight of calf, not get super thin doing it, breed back on time & live a long productive life doing it.         


       
 

GONEWEST

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 24, 2008
Messages
921
Location
GEORGIA
Leachman is long out of business. You see how good his theories worked. People have mentioned on here before that being a 4-H er and having 5 or 6 cows doesn't make you a cattleman. Well it works both ways. Wearing a big hat, having thousands of head and lots of ideas doesn't make you a smart cattleman, either.

Listen, I really like your cattle. I bet there are lots of situations where those Tarentaise cattle would make lots of sense, just like yours. My point is that if they are actually so efficient and so profitable they would be the number one beef breed in North America today or at least on the fast track to being there? that's all I'm saying. There is no one breed or one composite that works for all situations. All I ever meant to suggest was that here, we have lots of free eating and small cows are not as efficient as larger cows that produce more pounds  and carry less per acre expenses. That's all. I like your kind of cattle just like I like some of all breeds. Actually I REALLY like your the cattle that you own and show here. So I'm not trying to say bad things about them in any way. They just wouldn't work the best in a commercial situation for me.
 

simtal

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 3, 2008
Messages
1,066
Location
Champaign, IL
There is a big difference between efficiency and input costs.  Taller, later maturing animals are more efficient.  But have greater maintenance.
 

aj

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
6,423
Location
western kansas
I got my Shorthorn country with junior results in it. The champion shorthorn heifer was by rodeo drive. I have been told that rodeo drive was a frame 9 bull. I have been told that he was out of a blcak chi cow.....I always thought that this was sour grapes but people have changed my mind. I still think the wda deal is the greatest joke in the showring deal. All you have to do to raise good wda cattle is to lie about the birth date by about three months. Are rodeo drive cows big cows? I am assuming that he passed some kind of pureibilty test.
 

justintime

Well-known member
Joined
May 26, 2007
Messages
4,346
Location
Saskatchewan Canada
I saw Rodeo Drive numerous times when he was alive. He was not even close to being close to a 9 frame score.I don't know where this number came from, but I have heard it before.  I am not sure exactly what he would have measured but I have seen many bigger bulls, even today.My guess is that he may have been close to a 7.5 frame score. I can think of several bulls in that era that were bigger than he was.  His dam was a solid red cow, and yes she was an appendix cow, and she did appear to resemble what a female that was 7/8 Shorthorn and 1/8 Chi might look like.  I saw his dam as well, and she was not a black Chi cow. She did have a little shot of Chi in her, however, she was mostly Shorthorn in make-up. There are many appendix Shorthorn  bulls today that have less Shorthorn blood than Rodeo Drive did. I have been told that Rodeo Drive does have a DNA on file and he was blood typed prior to DNA profiling and he did qualify as having typical Shorthorn blood type. Rodeo Drive's sire was RPS Tribune x, an excellent solid red non asterisk purebred bull, that I tried to buy in Denver as a yearling, and missed getting it done by less than 5 minutes. Tribune would be a very popular bull if he was alive today, as he was moderate, thick and full of red meat. I would love to find some Tribune semen today. I would think there should be some around someplace.

Rodeo Drive did sire some females that were bigger framed by today's standards, however, he also sired many females that were very similar to the heifer that won the Junior Nationals. She is a very moderate framed heifer and she has enough thickness and volume. The first set of Rodeo bull calves I ever saw was a set of 15, that Cagwin's took to Denver to show in the yards. The morning they arrived in Denver, a commercial rancher came along and purchased the entire pen at $3500 each .Cagwins left them on display and did not show them in the yards show as they were already sold. I remember most breeders who looked at them at that time, said the bulls were too small framed.Where Rodeo really shines, is where he appears in the second generation of an animal's pedigree.

I have used three Rodeo bulls over the years in my herd. One was very moderate in frame, and I do wish I had collected semen as his offspring became some of our best cows. A son of this bull, also became a very good AI sire, and I still think he is one of the best calving ease sires I have ever used. I have attached a picture of him, and he is named Shadybrook Optimum x* and he was bred in our herd. His dam is still producing at Shadybrook at 15 years of age and I understand she has a super heifer calf on her this year, sired by a grandson of Rodeo Drive.

Some Rodeo offspring were too extreme for today, however, the good Rodeo females are in my opinion some of the best females I have ever set eyes on ... of any breed. When I consider the 5 best females I have ever seen, 3 of them are sired by Rodeo Drive. One thing he did well, was he put absolutely perfect udders on his daughters, and they milked very well.
 

Attachments

  • Shadybrook Optimum sp.jpg
    Shadybrook Optimum sp.jpg
    59.8 KB · Views: 164
Top