U
UnbridledStallion
Guest
Anyone have photos comparing cattle fed either Zilmax or Optaflexx to cattle receiving none?
Well does anyone have a picture showing cattle before and after reciving optaflexx? You could take one your self cowboylaw (I can't because I don't have the land to raise cattle). I just want to see the added muscle. Why anyone can't take a simple photo is beyond me, because feed that has optaflexx, isn't even a controlled substance, you can just go to a feed store and buy it.cowboylaw said:To answer your question: No.
And I doubt you'll find many, if any. Zilmax was taken off the market by the FDA. Optaflexx is still available.
GoWyo said:I don't know that it's fishing so much as "trolling." Don't feed it - zilmax or the troll.
MCC said:What I am about to post is based on my own observations and opinions.
First of all Zilmax was NOT taken off the market by the FDA. Merck pulled it off the market after a couple of the larger packing plants said they wouldn't accept Zilmax feed cattle because of soundness problems.
When both Optiflex and Zilmax first came out I was working at a Co. State Univ. research feedlot and we did several trials on both. There is a noticeable difference between cattle fed these beta agonists verses cattle not fed any. It is more noticeable in Zilmax fed cattle. Both ad muscle but will decrease fat. However the difference isn't like comparing the 98 pound weakling to a 320 pound nose tackle. Both will effect the quality grade however.
I now work in a JBS feedlot that did feed Zilmax until it was taken off the market. I didn't notice any more soundness problems with cattle fed Zilmax than without it if you feed it according to the label. I see unsoundness and structure problems on cattle we get in to feed before they ever are put on Zilmax or Optiflex and they will get worse the more weight you put on them whether they are fed a beta agonist or not. ( and no they aren't clubby bred )
Just my observations.
[that did feed zilmax until it was taken off the market] by Merck.rackranch said:I'm cornfused!!!
MCC said:What I am about to post is based on my own observations and opinions.
First of all Zilmax was NOT taken off the market by the FDA. Merck pulled it off the market after a couple of the larger packing plants said they wouldn't accept Zilmax feed cattle because of soundness problems.
When both Optiflex and Zilmax first came out I was working at a Co. State Univ. research feedlot and we did several trials on both. There is a noticeable difference between cattle fed these beta agonists verses cattle not fed any. It is more noticeable in Zilmax fed cattle. Both ad muscle but will decrease fat. However the difference isn't like comparing the 98 pound weakling to a 320 pound nose tackle. Both will effect the quality grade however.
I now work in a JBS feedlot that did feed Zilmax until it was taken off the market. I didn't notice any more soundness problems with cattle fed Zilmax than without it if you feed it according to the label. I see unsoundness and structure problems on cattle we get in to feed before they ever are put on Zilmax or Optiflex and they will get worse the more weight you put on them whether they are fed a beta agonist or not. ( and no they aren't clubby bred )
Just my observations.
I'm not a troll. The sole purpose of me registering on this site was for me to visually see how implants and/or beta-agonists effect muscle and/or male secondary sex characteristics and maybe see if it can do the same to horses (I'm sure I'm not the only one to have thought of implanting a horse or feeding it optaflexx).CAB said:GoWyo said:I don't know that it's fishing so much as "trolling." Don't feed it - zilmax or the troll.
Ditto!!
UnbridledStallion said:I'm not a troll. The sole purpose of me registering on this site was for me to visually see how implants and/or beta-agonists effect muscle and/or male secondary sex characteristics and maybe see if it can do the same to horses (I'm sure I'm not the only one to have thought of implanting a horse or feeding it optaflexx).CAB said:GoWyo said:I don't know that it's fishing so much as "trolling." Don't feed it - zilmax or the troll.
Ditto!!
UnbridledStallion said:I'm not a troll. The sole purpose of me registering on this site was for me to visually see how implants and/or beta-agonists effect muscle and/or male secondary sex characteristics and maybe see if it can do the same to horses (I'm sure I'm not the only one to have thought of implanting a horse or feeding it optaflexx).CAB said:GoWyo said:I don't know that it's fishing so much as "trolling." Don't feed it - zilmax or the troll.
Ditto!!
UnbridledStallion said:I'm not a troll. The sole purpose of me registering on this site was for me to visually see how implants and/or beta-agonists effect muscle and/or male secondary sex characteristics and maybe see if it can do the same to horses (I'm sure I'm not the only one to have thought of implanting a horse or feeding it optaflexx).CAB said:GoWyo said:I don't know that it's fishing so much as "trolling." Don't feed it - zilmax or the troll.
Ditto!!
OH Breeder said:UnbridledStallion said:I'm not a troll. The sole purpose of me registering on this site was for me to visually see how implants and/or beta-agonists effect muscle and/or male secondary sex characteristics and maybe see if it can do the same to horses (I'm sure I'm not the only one to have thought of implanting a horse or feeding it optaflexx).CAB said:GoWyo said:I don't know that it's fishing so much as "trolling." Don't feed it - zilmax or the troll.
Ditto!!
I guess I am confused. What's wrong with what's already approved for consumption now?![]()