Shawn_Larsen17
Well-known member
Debate!!!!!
Wouldn't it be kind of crazy not to sell the cloning rights to anybody interested in them if you owned them. I guess I think it will be a good deal for both buyer and seller with this transaction. That IMO makes it the best kind of deal.Quick fire said:Quality of quantity. Rodgers had my vote. In terms of the overall quality of each bull I prefer that. Having a ton of bulls every year and then only having 2-3 make it is not appealing to me.
Creature looks cool himself. I just like a bull with a good dam, the cow herself is hideous.
The next big thing is Man Among Boys no doubt.
Solid gold is actually horns bull, I hate when bull promoters clone other peoples bulls. Lautner cloned MAB too.
Just my opinion. Well aware it won't be agreed with by most and I understand that. That's fine
My opinion would be that Otto's were smart to hold onto the cloning rights and sell when there was demand for it, but that is JMO.Shawn_Larsen17 said:I don't think that they should clone a bull that is Rodgers, that's kind of saying that Rodgers are better because they have something Lautners want.
I said it on here before and I will again. Trausch's have an Eye Candy son that is one of the most impressive calves I've ever seen. He was raised by John Sullivan , his dam is a Who Made Who/Sugar Ray. I wasn't the only one impressed by him either...I havn't seen any of Lautner's or Rodger's, but he will be tough to top.Shawn_Larsen17 said:Who is going to be the best in Denver?