Judging Cattle

Help Support Steer Planet:

andholl

Active member
Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Messages
34
Location
North Texas
I am curious of what y'all think...
I've been showing cattle for a few years and I have noticed judges starting to judge all cattle the same. If you are showing an America influenced calf, then why would a judge put one at the bottum because it has too much front end? Why would you take away from from a Simmental or a Herford if they have extra brisket? Isn't this part of the breeds' characteristics?
If a judge doesn't like one because it is too big but it is still better than a smaller framed one, what is the point? Or if a judge just looks at the ones that are big all over and overlooks the smaller framed ones...?  ??? What kind of industry are we headed towards?

Tell me what you think  (pop)  <cowboy>
 

travis214

Active member
Joined
Mar 17, 2012
Messages
30
Location
Texas
I guess I'll take a shot. On the American influenced deal even though its a breed thing that they carry that extra leather up front, its still more ideal for them to be cleaner fronted. This would especially be the case if you were shwing it against all different breeds at a county show. As for the frame size, the show cattle industry has been all over the map so right now judges are trying to stick with "moderately" framed cattle over extremes in either direction. Also, i think its better that the majority of judges are basing their selection of the same criteria. It minimizes the chances of getting a good calf in the last hole just because it wasnt that particular judges type.
 

Bradenh

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 10, 2010
Messages
2,646
Location
Central Texas
There's really no right or wrong trait that's just going to make one or break one, who is to say what's right and wrong? There is no perfect calf, so therefore it's all speculation and what that man wants, he can't pity a breed when his job is to pick the best one.. All the breeds colors ect is forgotten and it's what's the best calf... I think you say they pick the same cattle because a good calf is a good calf regardless of the judge, if all judges want a sound one with a big but and top and good neck... Then they are going up use one that fits that, and if he's the best then chances are that others will use him too

As far as frame goes, that's also pure opinion, not nessicerially right and wrong, but it he did the opposite or vise versa, then he would e questioned by the people with a moderate calf,

With every calf sorted there's someone who will like it, and someone who won't

I personally like the cattle that are being used lately, and with that said my own personal cattle have not won much! But I still give judges props for finding the best
 

twistedhshowstock

Well-known member
Joined
May 2, 2011
Messages
758
Location
Nacogdoches, TX
I guess it depends on the situation you are talking about? Are you talking about in a supreme drive situation or within the breed.  Yes it is characteristic for American cattle to have some leather, but there is still a point when they are to wastey even for an American.  Some breeds characteristically have more brisket, but there is a point where its to much even for those breeds. Some breeds are more refined in their make up, but there is a point where they are to fine boned even for those breeds.  Some breeds are naturally more powerful and less feminine, but there is a point where females are to coarse and masculine even in those breeds.  Cattle are cattle and what we look for should be the same in every breed because the ultimate endpoint is the same for all breeds of beef cattle and that is the feedlot.  Now I am not saying they all need to look the exact same.  We have to keep breed characterstic for many reasons.  Americans for instance need the leather and ear to help expel heat and that is needed for the climate where most of them are raised, but to much leather actually makes it worse, can lead to some bulls being unable to breed, and is wasty in the packing plant.   Some of your exotic breeds dont need to be made more feminine and refined because they are meant to add the power and meat in a terminal cross.  Some of your more refined, less powerful breeds dont need to be more powerful because they are meant to bring the maternal ability, growth and finish.  So we dont need to change the breeds, but how we evaluate cattle is the same across breeds and always has been.  When we get to the Supreme drives we cant expect the Brahman to be as clean fronted and underlined as the Angus just like we cant expect the Angus to be as powerful as most continental breeds.  Thats when it gets important not to compare them to each other but pic based on which is the best representation of their breed.

As far as size there is a point where they are simply to big for what the industry wants.  We were in Ft Worth for the Jr Heifer show last weekend and heard it on the mic several times and I agreed, there were a lot of heifers there that were just to big for the class they were in.  When a 7 or 8 month old heifer comes in the ring the same size as heifers in classes 6 months or more older than her can you imagine how huge she will be at that age and even more so mature.   Her calves get that big and they are way to big before they finish and go to the kill floor.  

I think the problem is that there are a lot of judges that are to single tracked with their judging.  Some worry only about style on the profile, some are more intersted in power, etc, etc.  When we should be looking for the most fault free or in other words most complete calf in the ring.  Ryan Cotten made a good example of that in a class at ft worth last weekend.  I forget what class it was in  but there was a big stout,, broody heifer walk in the ring and everyone just new she had it won, he stood her 5th.  On the mic he said she was probably his favorite in the class for a lot of reasons, but when you started analizing the heifers she had a lot more faults than the 4 ahead of her.  They werent major faults which would let some judges use her higher, mabe even to when.  But they were faults none the less and he just couldnt use the heifer higher knowing she had more faults than those he placed over her.   And thats the way it should be.  But honestly the exhibitors have made it that way.  I always here them and the spectators saying how a judge was lost or they couldnt follow them all day and they are mad.  When really its pretty easy to follow them if you know what you are looking at because they are picking the most complete cattle, but so many of the people only know how to evaluate femininity and power.  And they want to be able to pic the winner as it walks in so they want the judge to pic either the most feminine or most powerful so that they can follow. And lets face it a lot of judges try to please the masses  so they get called for more shows.  It takes a judge with integrity to reach out there and pic the rightful winner that isnt the crowd favorite based on what they can tell from the stands, because that judge is destined for a toungue lashing after the show from somebody.
 

ChristaCheatham

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 8, 2011
Messages
302
I'm on a judging team for my school. For me personally, I like to choose the most complete animal. I'd rather pick a steer who covers all the bases then go for a steer who is the thickest or widest topped. Completeness is what I try to go to as far as when I pick out my calves and when I judge.
 
Top