DL said:
it is no favor when the association controls the use of the test in exchange for the $ - Dr B does not get his money for breed associations - you can see how well that type of arrangement worked by looking at the long nosed dwarf....
that was a mistake in negotiations, not due to where the money came from. the long nose dwarf project could have been rejected or negotiated.
agree it is no favor when the association controls the use of the test just as it is no favor to producers who could do the test themselves if they knew the sequence. a lot more research could be furthered if the gene was known and if more researchers knew what the linkage group was. more people could do some interesting linkage group research. cross species studies could be done to determine lots of things. one could put all the tests on the 500,000K chip and reduce the cost significantly on a per feature basis. chips aren't perfect though, but you could easily build some redundancy in.
what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
Dr. Beever rightly decided to license the tests as it wasn't useful for him to be the only one's doing the test. he's a researcher, not a production unit, and by his own admission, not highly automated. granted, the companies had some growing pains ramping up and the quality control wasn't quite good. but no one is perfect.