Stampede Steer Disqualification News Western Producer Aug 12th

Help Support Steer Planet:

cattlecountry

Active member
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
31
Owners of steer disqualified from Stampede for illegal drug use plan appeal

Posted Aug. 12th, 2013 by Mary MacArthur No Comments


Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on email Share on print More Sharing Services 0


 





Owners of the winning steer disqualified for drug use from the Calgary Stampede Steer Classic competition plan to appeal.

Riley Chalack and Royden Anderson said they followed the rules and a Calgary Stampede accredited veterinarian’s recommendations to use the painkiller Banamine on their show steer and shouldn’t be penalized.

“If the vet said it’s OK to use, we assume it’s OK to use. That’s why we went and asked him,” said Riley Chalack of Carstairs, Alta.

When the show steer became lame the day before the prestigious steer show, a group associated with the steer asked a Calgary Stampede veterinarian if it was OK to use the painkiller Anafen, which has a 24-hour withdrawal period and wouldn’t show up in blood tests.

Instead, the veterinarian suggested they use Banamine, with a six-day pre-slaughter withdrawal period.

“We asked to use Anafen. He said ‘No, it’s OK to use Banamine,’ ” said Chalack.

Raymond Gonnet, a cattle fitter with Trausch Farms, in Iowa, said the veterinarian said Anafen would last only a few hours and recommended Banamine as a better painkiller.

He said there was a circle of witnesses who heard the recommendation, including Chris Wilson, manager of Trausch Farms.

“I did witness the vets backing the use of the drug Banamine and then to hear about the disqualification, I was disappointed in the Stampede backing their vets as here say,” wrote Wilson in a statement to Stampede officials.

Gonnet, who was helping the steer’s owners, said it was clear everyone was discussing a show animal in the steer competition.

“This whole mess wouldn’t have happened if they said we couldn’t do anything. We were just trying to look after the animal’s well being,” said Gonnet.

“This whole thing stinks. He gave us the OK to use it. There’s nothing shady about this. We played by the rules. We contacted the vet. They’re now trying to cover up this mess,” said Gonnet.

Stampede rules state: “The Exhibitor acknowledges and agrees that any animal requiring care by a veterinarian must consult a Stampede accredited veterinarian and that Stampede accredited veterinarians are required to bring to the attention of Stampede officials any concerns or issues that may arise.”

Bonnie Clark, communications adviser with the Calgary Stampede, said no one was available for an interview and emailed the following statement.

“We are open to having these discussions with those directly impacted and continue to invite those individuals to engage with Stampede officials directly.

“At this time, we are not in a position to speculate on what may or may not come from any review, or comment on aspects related to the situation. The Calgary Stampede will continue to evaluate the facts of this situation. This will take time, as we are committed to being as thorough and complete as possible to ensure all relevant information is encompassed,” she wrote.

Anderson said they have also hired a lawyer to obtain a copy of the blood test from the Calgary Stampede.

Veterinarian Roy Lewis said while he doesn’t know the rules for Calgary Stampede veterinarians, he is hired by Farmfair International, an Edmonton cattle show, to look after the health of the animals at that event.

“They’re encouraged to come see me,” said Lewis.

“We know what’s going on in the barn. If there’s a problem, we’ll catch it,” he said.

Lewis said he draws on his experience as a veterinarian, the animal’s health, common sense and discussions with owners to decide the action needed if an animal is sick during a show.

Lewis said he won’t drain a “puffy joint” at a show because that would be altering an animal, but he will offer an alternative medication, especially if the animal is in pain.

“It’s our judgment,” said Lewis.

At cattle shows, owners are concerned about administering high amounts of antibiotics that may leave “lumps and bumps” on a show animal. Instead Lewis and the owners discuss alternative injection locations that won’t be obvious and downgrade the animal in the show ring.

Administering painkillers to animals, as is the case with the disqualified Calgary Stampede show calf, gets into “grey areas,” he said.

If an animal is lame because it hurt itself at the show and is not generally like that, Lewis said he wouldn’t consider a painkiller to be altering, but rather it masks the pain for the animal’s welfare  and health.

Anderson and Chalack also take issue with the decision by the Calgary Stampede not to leave the decision to disqualify the animal to the steer committee.

“They (Stampede officials) are making the committee look powerless and pointless,” said Anderson.

Veterinarian Don Miller, chair of the steer committee said Calgary Stampede officials ruled on the disqualification, not the volunteer committee.

“As a committee chair, I had no direction over blood being taken. It was a Calgary Stampede sanction. They have the right to do it. I was not aware of it until they took the blood,” said Miller.

He said because many exhibitors are clients of steer committee members, no one on the committee wants to be involved in any disqualification.

“Why would anybody on a committee level want to be involved in making decisions like that? That is why it’s left up to the Stampede or the executive. Believe me, I don’t want to be the one making the decision,” he said.

“We were literally kept in the dark.”

Miller said the committee will look at the rules to see if changes should be made.
 

cattlecountry

Active member
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
31
Rule 19 in the Stampede Classic Steer Rules state:  The Calgary Stampede Steer Classic Committee reserves the right to decide on any point covered or not covered by the above regulations.

As you can see the steer committee didn't know anything about anything. Rules are rules and if the stampede board wants to make decisions then they should abide by the rules also and let the steer committee do the ruling! Better yet Don should have read the rules  and stood up to the Stampede Board. Now Rule 19 was broken. Fair is fair if exhibitors are to obey the rules so should the Stampede Board and Steer Committee.

Next Question is if Don didn't know anything why did he take that steer home with him!!!!! And why weren't the owners aware?
 

BTDT

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
443
Information is still from "interested parties". The person who really needs to be heard from was not.
Consulting a vet is very very different from having the vet administer the drug, which is what you implied earlier.
Also states the volunteer committee is made up of "interested parties" who want NO PART of DQ'ing a steer. Best interest of the show???
Did not clear up the issue on where the steer was lame due to injury or due to structure.
Eyewitnesses all were "interested parties" on the steer side, which is fine, but..
No interview from "tom"? No interview from "vet"? No comment from stampede?

Still way too many unanswered questions, on BOTH sides.

I will reserve judgment until the investigation is complete. 

 

cattlecountry

Active member
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
31
All partys involved vets and steer committee were asked to have all questions forwarded to Max Fritz of the Stampede Board or their communications liason in this case Bonnie Clark. If you know anything about politics and beauracracy you know that  everyone gets a gag order and one person representing the board will speak on their behalf due to liability and so on. This is nothing new. Thats why its called politics! You have to remember that whatever the vet says or steer committee says can be held liable to the Stampede Board. Just like your employer is liable to your action while you work for them. No different in this case.
 

cattlecountry

Active member
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
31
The stampede board isn't being very forthright they still haven't shown or given the blood test results to the owners or public that's why they hired a lawyer so they could actually see the results of what they are accused of. That is more than fair!
 

rackranch

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 14, 2010
Messages
1,245
Location
under the X in Texas
I stopped reading...Right here!!!!

cattlecountry said:
Owners of steer disqualified from Stampede for illegal drug use plan appeal

Posted Aug. 12th, 2013 by Mary MacArthur No Comments


Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on email Share on print More Sharing Services 0


 





Owners of the winning steer disqualified for drug use from the Calgary Stampede Steer Classic competition plan to appeal.

Riley Chalack and Royden Anderson said they followed the rules and a Calgary Stampede accredited veterinarian’s recommendations to use the painkiller Banamine on their show steer and shouldn’t be penalized.

“If the vet said it’s OK to use, we assume it’s OK to use. That’s why we went and asked him,” said Riley Chalack of Carstairs, Alta.

When the show steer became lame the day before the prestigious steer show, a group associated with the steer asked a Calgary Stampede veterinarian if it was OK to use the painkiller Anafen, which has a 24-hour withdrawal period and wouldn’t show up in blood tests.

Instead, the veterinarian suggested they use Banamine, with a six-day pre-slaughter withdrawal period.

“We asked to use Anafen. He said ‘No, it’s OK to use Banamine,’ ” said Chalack.

Raymond Gonnet, a cattle fitter with Trausch Farms, in Iowa, said the veterinarian said Anafen would last only a few hours and recommended Banamine as a better painkiller.

He said there was a circle of witnesses who heard the recommendation, including Chris Wilson, manager of Trausch Farms.

“I did witness the vets backing the use of the drug Banamine and then to hear about the disqualification, I was disappointed in the Stampede backing their vets as here say,” wrote Wilson in a statement to Stampede officials.

Gonnet, who was helping the steer’s owners, said it was clear everyone was discussing a show animal in the steer competition.

“This whole mess wouldn’t have happened if they said we couldn’t do anything. We were just trying to look after the animal’s well being,” said Gonnet.

“This whole thing stinks. He gave us the OK to use it. There’s nothing shady about this. We played by the rules. We contacted the vet. They’re now trying to cover up this mess,” said Gonnet.

Stampede rules state: “The Exhibitor acknowledges and agrees that any animal requiring care by a veterinarian must consult a Stampede accredited veterinarian and that Stampede accredited veterinarians are required to bring to the attention of Stampede officials any concerns or issues that may arise.”

Bonnie Clark, communications adviser with the Calgary Stampede, said no one was available for an interview and emailed the following statement.

“We are open to having these discussions with those directly impacted and continue to invite those individuals to engage with Stampede officials directly.

“At this time, we are not in a position to speculate on what may or may not come from any review, or comment on aspects related to the situation. The Calgary Stampede will continue to evaluate the facts of this situation. This will take time, as we are committed to being as thorough and complete as possible to ensure all relevant information is encompassed,” she wrote.

Anderson said they have also hired a lawyer to obtain a copy of the blood test from the Calgary Stampede.

Veterinarian Roy Lewis said while he doesn’t know the rules for Calgary Stampede veterinarians, he is hired by Farmfair International, an Edmonton cattle show, to look after the health of the animals at that event.

“They’re encouraged to come see me,” said Lewis.

“We know what’s going on in the barn. If there’s a problem, we’ll catch it,” he said.

Lewis said he draws on his experience as a veterinarian, the animal’s health, common sense and discussions with owners to decide the action needed if an animal is sick during a show.

Lewis said he won’t drain a “puffy joint” at a show because that would be altering an animal, but he will offer an alternative medication, especially if the animal is in pain.

“It’s our judgment,” said Lewis.

At cattle shows, owners are concerned about administering high amounts of antibiotics that may leave “lumps and bumps” on a show animal. Instead Lewis and the owners discuss alternative injection locations that won’t be obvious and downgrade the animal in the show ring.

Administering painkillers to animals, as is the case with the disqualified Calgary Stampede show calf, gets into “grey areas,” he said.

If an animal is lame because it hurt itself at the show and is not generally like that, Lewis said he wouldn’t consider a painkiller to be altering, but rather it masks the pain for the animal’s welfare  and health.

Anderson and Chalack also take issue with the decision by the Calgary Stampede not to leave the decision to disqualify the animal to the steer committee.

“They (Stampede officials) are making the committee look powerless and pointless,” said Anderson.

Veterinarian Don Miller, chair of the steer committee said Calgary Stampede officials ruled on the disqualification, not the volunteer committee.

“As a committee chair, I had no direction over blood being taken. It was a Calgary Stampede sanction. They have the right to do it. I was not aware of it until they took the blood,” said Miller.

He said because many exhibitors are clients of steer committee members, no one on the committee wants to be involved in any disqualification.

“Why would anybody on a committee level want to be involved in making decisions like that? That is why it’s left up to the Stampede or the executive. Believe me, I don’t want to be the one making the decision,” he said.

“We were literally kept in the dark.”

Miller said the committee will look at the rules to see if changes should be made.
 
Top