I agree with all of the above!
But, I point the finger to money...to the glory of the purple banner.
I'm with RW...I go to shows to promote my cattle, not to win. I would rather have a big check than a purple banner.
I think the line between cattle judge/cattle owner/cattle enthusist/ cattle jock/ cattle breeder gets blurred. Human nature to pick your friends, pick your clients. Example: If I bred Bob the bull and sold him to Jones. Jones promotes the crap out of him and shows him. I am a respected breeder and judge (ok, a stretch there!! ;D) so I am ask to judge the national show. Jones shows up with Bob. Remember, I bred and raised Bob. Of course I like him, I raise the type of cattle I like (duh) so of course I am going to compare all others to him. Now that is not to say another bull won't be better (whatever "better" is), but I bred/raised Bob, so he's gonna be the one to beat. Fair? Not exactly. Acceptable? Maybe. Human? Yep.
Do I think shows are 100% honest? No. But why should they be? The cattle certainly aren't honest most of the time. Birth dates changed, bloodlines blurred, breeds mixed, color changed/enhanced, ownership challenged. Do we expect an honest judge to judge dishonest cattle??
RW: what do you think of the Reds idea of mixing EPD's? And giving up BW epds????