knabe
Well-known member
here's ambush reporting of teddy kennedy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbDwbUZar0o&eurl=http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/15/hot-air-tv-teddy-kennedys-estate-tax-avoidance/
"we pay our share"
i'm assuming everyone should pay their fair share
135,000 on an estate of 300 million, they pay only 0.04% through trust funds and foundations.
why not just tax everyone the same, instead of a web of payoffs. why, because the calibrators must remain in power because only THEY now how to offset subsidies, tax breaks, regulations etc.
amazing people keep voting for this way of thinking. i'm thinking this is not "CHANGE" but more of the same. if obama wants change, he should throw this guy under the bus and not his grandmother, or people who resort to their guns and religion. teddy's ring (or boot) must have an awful lot of lip gloss on it.
i'm assuming estate planning should exempt 90% as was alluded to in an earlier post.
so why not just tax estates at 10% and get rid of all the nonsense. it seems like this has been decided as a "FAIR" amount. of course this wouldn't be a cobbled together, vote buying scheme. it would reduce the need for politicians, if only a little bit. that dude needs to dig at least one fence post hole.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbDwbUZar0o&eurl=http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/15/hot-air-tv-teddy-kennedys-estate-tax-avoidance/
"we pay our share"
i'm assuming everyone should pay their fair share
135,000 on an estate of 300 million, they pay only 0.04% through trust funds and foundations.
why not just tax everyone the same, instead of a web of payoffs. why, because the calibrators must remain in power because only THEY now how to offset subsidies, tax breaks, regulations etc.
amazing people keep voting for this way of thinking. i'm thinking this is not "CHANGE" but more of the same. if obama wants change, he should throw this guy under the bus and not his grandmother, or people who resort to their guns and religion. teddy's ring (or boot) must have an awful lot of lip gloss on it.
i'm assuming estate planning should exempt 90% as was alluded to in an earlier post.
so why not just tax estates at 10% and get rid of all the nonsense. it seems like this has been decided as a "FAIR" amount. of course this wouldn't be a cobbled together, vote buying scheme. it would reduce the need for politicians, if only a little bit. that dude needs to dig at least one fence post hole.