knabe said:
TJ said:
The people who do organic farming (many of them are in Texas) all swear by spray broadcasting a mixture of 1 gallon of liquid molasses + 100 gallons of water on their pastures several times per year. I've been told that you get more "bang for you buck" doing that than anything else. It probably will cost more to apply it than it will to buy the molasses & water. Supposedly it will help to put some trace minerals back in the soil, but the main benefit is that the molasses feeds the beneficial bugs in the soil, which build organic matter. I know people use dry molasses for organic lawn care, but that would get quite costly & you need rain/water to take it in the ground. Plus, if you are in a drought, I would think that every drop of liquid would help. ***Note... if you spray it as Chambero mentioned below... don't do the molasses spray thing, because it will not help! The chemical spray is counter productive to doing this, because it will kill the bugs that you are feeding. Actually, the organic people claim that the molasses mixture will reduce weed populations over time, due to increased fertility/production, and they claim that over time the chemicals will eventually increase weeds due to the opposite effects. Beyond telling you what the organic people think... I'm not touching that one! ;-)
so are there actual trials rather than swearing?
why not just feed the molasses and water to the cattle and let them distribute it?
any soil tests to detect trace mineral increase or stability?
funny how ALWAYS the organic method is incompatible with conventional fertilizers and sprays.
this is the fundamental requirement of religion.
please provide peer reviewed studies with actual data. claims are simply useless.
I was just giving 2nd hand info ("The people who do organic farming all swear...") & also sharing my own personal observations. However, I can tell you that a test plot was done 15-20 years ago where a mixture of water & sugar provided an increase in corn yield over the control plots. The results weren't published, but I can probably get my hands on them. If I can produce that the test plot results showing that sugar & water worked, will that satisfy?
knabe... letting cattle fertilize the pastures themselves is by far the most cost effective fertilization program going! That's a big reason why intense rotational grazing works so well. Of course, animals do absorb some of the nutrients, and it does take longer for nature to break down a pile of manure than it does liquid molasses, but I suspect that you already realized that...
knabe... it's obvious that this topic strikes a nerve with you. But, you are correct, you should always do a soil test... both a before & after. I never said that a person shouldn't. A company in or near, Princeton, IL, sells many of these products & "other" Ag products (it's not a 100% organic outfit) & they base their entire program on taking "multiple soil tests" & making recommendations. The tests are done before and after. I could also put you in contact with them & maybe they will share their test results with you. I've never applied molasses, so I've never tested for it. I don't have the results in front of me for the same reason. Personally, I was just trying to be helpful & my info was provided on a "take or leave it" basis. I could care less if anyone tries it & I wont make a dime either way. I suspect since nobody has a patent on molasses & nothing to gain, is probably why no public trials have been conducted.
Knabe... you can't tell me that compost needs a trial to prove that it will work. How many horticulturalist use or recommend compost? Yet compost is incompatible with most conventional practices. Compost was one of the things that I mentioned. In the tea form, it can be broadcast via spray. As can the liquid molasses.
If you really want to see test results or research & see if these things work or not, I'll give you the contact info & I'll let you do the digging. I know what I know... I have nothing to gain by doing it & nothing to lose by not doing it. Again, I was just trying to be helpful. Sorry that bothers you. I can be wrong & I for sure don't have all the answers.
Here is the website for AgriEnergy Resources in Princeton, IL...
http://www.agrienergy.net/ They offer "lab services" for soil AND plant testing. How many test their own plants to check the uptake? I've seen their products in action & they work.
Conklin has some extremely good products too... they are not certified organic, but they are really good "non traditonal products" that can be applied by a sprayer. I've got gobs of pics (like double or triple the root mass size), trial results & plenty of literature to prove those work. We have plenty of grain farmers who buy bulk tank truck loads of the stuff, so they obviously think that they work. The only thing is, they can be a little pricey, but if you simply want results... I don't think Conklin can be beat.
With all that said, not everything posted on steer planet has to be backed up by research. How many swear by this hair mixture or that one... yet very little, if any trial data is ever shared as to which mix makes the hair train better, pop more, grow faster or become better conditioned... ? Is beet pulp better fed wet or dry or pelleted of in shreds? Is beet pulp better or are cotton seed hulls better? Is liquid fat better than feeding a solid fat supplement like stabilized rice bran? So many questions, so little research, yet so many posts with different answers. Yet, I'm probably the only poster asked to provide research.