out here, they use what used to be the soil conservation service and equip to basically streamline the regulation process so you don't have to deal with 7 or 8 agencies. they do it for you, but in exchange, they tell you what to do and will impose things like you need a permit to remove noxious weeds from streambeds, you can't remove trees that block streams and roll flooding to surrounding areas, and you can't graze in the stream beds to keep some of the willows tromped down. they don't have much flexiblity unless it's government owned land, then they can do what they want and simply have a lawyer remind them in a public forum that if the agency deems it in the public good, they can ignore any science, or any species, or any existing zoning. they actually did this at a public hearing the other day with a tiger salamander pond because a college is going in on the site and they are going to rezone it for high density housing, of course right next to me. all the while the property was allowed a property tax exemption for literally 20 years to be kept as a hay field. when they found out the college was interested in the site, they immediately over disced the field to destroy kit fox burrows, burrowing owls, and tiger salamander habitat, and low and behold, when their environemntal team went to take a survey, they didn't find anything.
i think these agencies need to be seriously curtailed. they "always" know what's best and the owner "never" does. no comprimising.