JIT you really don't need to apologize you had a bull in a sale-it sounds like you described him in terms of your environment-but if thats him pictured right off the trailer-(NOT 3-4 MONTHS LATER) then he doesnt really look too sporty and if you had known at that time I think some kind of restitution would have been in order.-DEPENDS how much time elapsed-THATS THE KEY XBAR-it seems like a few years went by before you came unglued-and I do remember you making positive comments on here about the bull-although thats a lot of threads ago.So I guess my questions are old news and the same as everbody else's--I have a few cattle left in Southern Kansas and the environment is VERY similar with similar results lost on several--The bull didnt work-the SP statute of limitations is certainly up: AND-you have a Canadian bull that DID WORK-although Im guessing from a somewhat different environment- Sometimes just gotta move on when you didnt strike while the iron was hot.. O0
I do not know when the pictures were taken that Ryan has posted. The first picture was taken here in January prior to our March sale. The bulls then went to the sale and then came home and went back onto the same feed as prior to the sale. I do not stuff my bulls as we want them to be sound and athletic. My bulls have been fed the same ration now for several years. When we pictured our sale bulls two weeks ago, the photographer, who pictures bulls all across Western Canada commented that our bulls were in perfect condition. I could care less about maximum gains but I do like to get enough gains to be able to test the bull's ability to grow. That is why I weigh them every 28 days so I can talk intelligently about the growth patterns of different bulls on the same ration. I delivered this bull to South Dakota where I met Ryan's partner in this bull. I am not sure exactly when the bull arrived at Ryan's farm. He may have told me, but I can't remember when. The bull did NOT look anything like this when I last set eyes on him in SD. In any event, Ryan seemed pleased enough when he got him, at least he made no mention to me about not being pleased.
Ryan seems to think that because I mentioned that Cruiser ran on bush pasture that I am exaggerating or lieing. The only reason I mentioned this is because he did actually on a pretty rugged pasture for this part of the world. It was 70 miles east of where I live and is was 125 miles from his owners farm. He was pretty much on his own in that pasture as far as looking after himself. That is the only reason I said what I did.
I debated not even replying to Ryan's posts and I wouldn't have even bothered to, but I felt that I needed to respond when he made reference to my honestly and reputation. That is where I have to draw a line.
I have no idea why Ryan got some unacceptable birth weights from this bull. Sometimes, genetics seem to make everything unclear. I used a BW trait leader in the ASA sire summary on a few cows a few years ago. I got 2 bulls and 3 heifers. The 2 bull calves were assisted at birth and both weighed over 110 lbs at birth. I band every bull calf over 110 lbs and these two bulls were the only two that got banded at birth. There was nothing in the background of either dam that suggested I would get big calves. I dumped the rest of this semen and moved on. I can't explain why this happened.
I am not angry with Ryan. I just wish he had handled this situation better. Why did he decide to vent on a public forum, and not contact me directly? Why am I just hearing much of this now for the first time, when a few years have passed since I sold the bull to him. Enough said!