farwest
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2008
- Messages
- 916
Exactly. Cutting those union workers back to fifteen dollars an hour will do nothing for the economy. It will just line management pockets
farwest said:Exactly. Cutting those union workers back to fifteen dollars an hour will do nothing for the economy. It will just line management pockets
cowz said:Thanks for bringing this up because this has been bothering me.....Question for the group.,,,,Is this money a GIFT or a LOAN?
The bailout concept started being promoted as an economic stimulus loan,,,,,now us SHEEP are accepting this incredibly huge amount of taxpayer money as a simple bailout!
The only way I think we should bailout the auto guys is if they pull their heads out of their......! How about making Ford and Dodge design 1 ton pickups that get 50 miles per gallon. We can put men on the moon, but we cannot design fuel efficient vehicles. Germans and Japanese can do it but not gas hogging us!
farwest said:Having a union job let me say this. I don't believe for a second there are organized labor jobs in the auto industry paying 200k a year. i've been told the companies came up with these wage numbers by adding in pensions and benefits to put up ficticious numbers. Any time you have organized labor, unions, or agreement employees, whatever you want to call them, and then you have management who are non-agreemnet employees there become a hate betweent labor and management and the company is what suffers. Neither cares how much they rape the company or the job they do, as long as they get one over on the other or pull more on the paycheck. A thought, if 10 percent of those line workers in those plants didn't show up tomorrow, it would virtually shut them down. Half the management could not show up and you wouldn't even know it. These companies are all extremely top heavy on management and insist on screwing down the unions to keep the bonuses coming to the top of management. Any one who thinks 20 to 25 dollars an hour living in Detroit working 40 hrs per week is gonna get you anywhere your wrong. Do away with the unions in this country and you just widened the gap further between the upper and lower class.-
knabe said:airlines went out of business and the planes kept flying.
the business model is outdated. what's the fastest path to a new business model that doens't involve folkswagens?
Unskilled, hell standing in an assebly line knowing your job with 30 years experience under your belt, is that unskilled. What you think we'll pull some educated idiot with some flimsy piece of degree from some small state university to do the job better, and that will be skilled labor. Take the union fees, twice what social security is for retirement, state and local taxes and then what's left of that 52k. i get a kick out of farm and ranch families, ( i'm one of them), who look at these urban wages and think it's rediculous. There making the same thing, only it's lumped under operating and most don't know what the real cost of living would be if they were renting a house, buying groceries, making vehichle payments, utilities off of a monthly earned income.Davis Shorthorns said:farwest said:Having a union job let me say this. I don't believe for a second there are organized labor jobs in the auto industry paying 200k a year. i've been told the companies came up with these wage numbers by adding in pensions and benefits to put up ficticious numbers. Any time you have organized labor, unions, or agreement employees, whatever you want to call them, and then you have management who are non-agreemnet employees there become a hate betweent labor and management and the company is what suffers. Neither cares how much they rape the company or the job they do, as long as they get one over on the other or pull more on the paycheck. A thought, if 10 percent of those line workers in those plants didn't show up tomorrow, it would virtually shut them down. Half the management could not show up and you wouldn't even know it. These companies are all extremely top heavy on management and insist on screwing down the unions to keep the bonuses coming to the top of management. Any one who thinks 20 to 25 dollars an hour living in Detroit working 40 hrs per week is gonna get you anywhere your wrong. Do away with the unions in this country and you just widened the gap further between the upper and lower class.-
Since when is 52,000 dollars a year for unskilled labor not getting anywhere???
GONEWEST said:Since when is 52,000 dollars a year for unskilled labor not getting anywhere???
First, $52,000 a year is about $700 a week after taxes. Second, $700 a week doesn't go as far in the Detroit metro area as it does in East Egypt, KS. The Cost of Living Index in the Greater Detroit Metro Area is 101. The CLI for Manhattan, KS is 82. It costs 19% more just to live where the major auto makers are located. The average home loan in the GDMA is $138,000, for Manhattan, KS its $123,000 so it costs about a hundred dollars more a month to buy an "average home." And I assure you the "average home" in Detroit is nothing compared to the "average home" in Manhattan, KS. Buy a house, food, a decent vehicle and pay the light bill and $700 a week is history. Of course you can live in a dump, drive an old vehicle until the wheels fall off and all that, but that's not my idea of "getting anywhere." Nor will that kind of life style and spending fuel the economy of this country.
As far as unions go, that is an issue like abortion, very strong opinions on each side and one side will never see the other, so I won't agrgue that. I do know that union's protection of poor employees with poor work ethinc caused the closing of a plant where my father worked for 38 years. And from being in management for 25 years with several corporations I know that without the threat of organized employees, companies would never give employees a fair shake. But my note about employees not making enough at most of the jobs that are available in this country was not union related.
Recently in the Atlanta area Delta Airlines laid off 3,000 employees. It is thought that 10,000 jobs need to be created to take the place of those 3,000 as far as their effect on the local economy. And are those same 3,000 people supposed to work those 10,000 jobs? People need to make enough money that they have extra to spend in order for the economy to function. Paying your mortgage, groceries, and the light bill will not do it. And like I mentioned before, many people here don't even make enough to qualify to get a mortgage, at least with the new banking rules in place.
Today our govenor proposed an economic stimulus package that basically builds roads and repairs school buildings. That MIGHT give a few unemployed people a JOB. Mostly it will provide more work for illegal aliens (don't get me started about the drag they have on the economy), as the companies that bid these projects the lowest always use the cheapest labor, of course.
Manufacturing in the US is for ever gone on the scale that it once was. Actually producing something of value one of the few ways a cmpany can make a profit and still provide good pay to its employees. This house of cards "service economy " has collapsed. The only way that I see to provide new jobs that pay well is for the federal government to heavily invest in energy self sufficiency. That is a sector that could provide good paying jobs for all skill levels of employees and help the country at the same time. However, I cringe at anything the deferal government might do to "help" us. Plus all this energy independence will be forgotten just like it was in the 80's if fuel continues to drop in price or stays where it is for a long period.
It's raining here, I can't do anything outside, I got all day to look up facts and argue![]()