I have sat on the sidelines here watching this debate and I am now jumping in here.
Firstly, coyote ... you have an excellent set of F1 heifers. I like your idea of putting a Charolais bull on them once they have had their first calves. Those tan calves of both sexes are flat good. When we ran our purebred Charolais herd along with our purebred Shorthorn herd, we used to breed all our Charolais heifers to a Shorthorn bull and we used to put some of the bottom end Shorthorn cows with our Charolais herd sire. We mainly did this to make our numbers fit our pastures better, but the results were excellent. The tan F1 calves had the cattle buyers actually looking like they cared when these calves were selling, and we oftentimes topped the market. The FI Char X Shorthorn heifers were retained and sold as bred heifers. We had standing orders for them from 3 commercial cattle operations and they would pay a premium of $250- 300 more for them. When one of these herds was dispersed, there were more than 50 of these F1 females from our herd in the sale, and many of them were amongst the top sellers. The only other cross I would think could really work on these females is a very good horned Hereford bull. I bet I get inquiries for over 300 Hereford X Shorthorn replacement heifers every year. Two years ago an outfit in Alberta phoned and wanted 300 F1 Hereford X Shorthorn heifers themselves. I simply could not find them. I just can't understand why more people aren't raising these replacements.
Secondly, I was almost crawling out of my skin, at some of judge's comments. It is a known historic fact that in the development years of the Angus breed in the UK, that Shorthorn blood was used. If you don't believe this, read any historical book on this. Better yet, talk with Scottish cattle breeders. They openly accept this fact.
I don't think there is any breed who can claim to have total purity. In the 70s the Angus breed was as bad as any out there. I remember talking to a leading US Angus breeder in the early 70s and he asked me if I knew where he could find semen from a Milking Shorthorn bull named McKee's Matchless Dairyman. He said he liked to use this bull because the calves were solid black and also very good, but he was having trouble finding semen anymore. If you don't believe that some Chi blood entered the gene pool in that same era, you must be living under a rock. When you look at the changes in type in many breeds over a few decades, it is very obvious to me. You do not get this type of change when you breed " like to like". I also remember several years ago that a neighbor bred most of his purebred Angus herd to a recent Denver Champion Angus bull. He asked me to come over and see his calves the next spring, and when I saw them, I was really impressed with the 4 calves out about 20 by this sire, that had large white stars on their heads. Holstein is my guess! This has also happened in the Shorthorn breed, but I maintain the Shorthorn breed had some diverse branches within the breed, which they could access as well to seek change. I do not think a person could find a so called purebred in any breed that has the same genetic composition as the original cattle in the breed. I found it interesting that when I visited with Donald McGillvary who owned the famous Calrossie herd in Scotland, he said that there were lots of " questionable genetics" used in the 50s, in the Shorthorn breed. No breed is exempt. No breed can claim total purity. IMO, we have to accept good cattle of any breed for their own merit and accept the fact that there are superb cattle in every breed. No breed has a corner on quality. Some breeds have done a much superior job of marketing, and the Angus breed probably as done the most impressive job of this in history.
When I was a kid, we had a neighbor who had a wonderful herd of Angus cows. This family was very close friends with my parents so we were oftentimes over there and I can still remember some of the amazing Angus cows they had. They oftentimes took Angus bulls to Regina Bull Sale, and I can always remember my dad saying that he would like to have 20 of our neighbors best black cows, but he did not think he could stand the constant disappointment at sale time. In those days, Angus had to poorest sale averages at almost all bull sales, and many good Angus bulls did not get a bid. I have to give the Angus breed full marks for the job they have done. It is second to none and the Angus ship probably will never sink!
I also was left scratching my head at judges comment regarding feedlots don't buy purebred Shorthorns. I used to run a feedlot and I know many feedlot operators who really like to feed Shorthorn calves. I think in Canada, the Shorthorn breed, gained incredible change in attitude, when a pen of 110 purebred Shorthorn steers received the highest premium ever given by Cargill based on carcass quality. This set of steers were fed in a 30,000 head lot and they also had the best feed efficiency in that set of cattle being fed at the same time. These Shorthorn steers all came from the same herd, entered the feedlot the same day and all left the same day. This feedlot has since expanded and they are one of the biggest lots in Western Canada. They love to buy Shorthorns providing they can get enough similar cattle to fill their pens. I used to be a cattle buyer, when we were running our feedlot, and I still keep in contact with some other buyers, and they ask me often about Shorthorn calves to buy. Personally, I don't sell many steers anymore, except the bottom end, but our pure Shorthorn steers usually bring excellent prices.
I have rambled on here long enough but I could go on and on. I will just say, no breed is perfect. No breed has all the best quality. I can find lots and lots of Angus cattle today that are quite frankly, p**s poor. But the good ones are really good. Just like in any other breed.
One more thing... congrats to coyote and his family for getting this set of super replacements. Regardless whether they decide to keep them or sell them, I am betting they will benefit from owning them.